Cuba vs Kazakhstan: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

Cuba
3,895 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Kazakhstan
4,167 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Cuba rank
26th
Kazakhstan rank
24th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

  • Cuba
  • Kazakhstan
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k197019952021

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 4,167 current US$ per square kilometre against 3,895 current US$ per square kilometre in Cuba, a difference of 272 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 26th and Kazakhstan ranks 24th of 216 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 2 and Kazakhstan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
1990s 135.56 current US$ per square kilometre 13.81 current US$ per square kilometre 121.76 current US$ per square kilometre Cuba
2000s 2,186 current US$ per square kilometre 310.36 current US$ per square kilometre 1,876 current US$ per square kilometre Cuba
2010s 706.54 current US$ per square kilometre 1,147 current US$ per square kilometre 440.22 current US$ per square kilometre Kazakhstan
2020s 2,305 current US$ per square kilometre 2,937 current US$ per square kilometre 632.04 current US$ per square kilometre Kazakhstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Cuba or Kazakhstan?
Kazakhstan, at 4,167 current US$ per square kilometre against 3,895 current US$ per square kilometre in Cuba as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Cuba and Kazakhstan?
272 current US$ per square kilometre, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Kazakhstan?
30 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2021.
How do Cuba and Kazakhstan rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
Cuba ranks 26th and Kazakhstan ranks 24th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Kazakhstan: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cuba/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cuba/kazakhstan/">Cuba vs Kazakhstan: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.