Cuba vs Guatemala: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

Cuba
3,895 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Guatemala
4,215 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Cuba rank
26th
Guatemala rank
23rd

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

  • Cuba
  • Guatemala
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k197019952021

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 4,215 current US$ per square kilometre against 3,895 current US$ per square kilometre in Cuba, a difference of 320 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 26th and Guatemala ranks 23rd of 216 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 4 and Guatemala in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Guatemala Difference Ahead
1970s 100.43 current US$ per square kilometre 20.44 current US$ per square kilometre 79.99 current US$ per square kilometre Cuba
1980s 176.16 current US$ per square kilometre 13.47 current US$ per square kilometre 162.69 current US$ per square kilometre Cuba
1990s 159.14 current US$ per square kilometre 4.81 current US$ per square kilometre 154.33 current US$ per square kilometre Cuba
2000s 2,186 current US$ per square kilometre 374.43 current US$ per square kilometre 1,812 current US$ per square kilometre Cuba
2010s 706.54 current US$ per square kilometre 2,030 current US$ per square kilometre 1,324 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2020s 2,305 current US$ per square kilometre 2,817 current US$ per square kilometre 511.76 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Cuba or Guatemala?
Guatemala, at 4,215 current US$ per square kilometre against 3,895 current US$ per square kilometre in Cuba as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Cuba and Guatemala?
320 current US$ per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Guatemala?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Cuba and Guatemala rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
Cuba ranks 26th and Guatemala ranks 23rd of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Guatemala: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cuba/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cuba/guatemala/">Cuba vs Guatemala: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.