Cuba vs Kyrgyzstan: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

Cuba
3,895 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Kyrgyzstan
3,773 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Cuba rank
26th
Kyrgyzstan rank
27th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

  • Cuba
  • Kyrgyzstan
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k197019952021

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 3,895 current US$ per square kilometre against 3,773 current US$ per square kilometre in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 122 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 26th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 27th of 216 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 2 and Kyrgyzstan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Kyrgyzstan Difference Ahead
1990s 135.56 current US$ per square kilometre 62.48 current US$ per square kilometre 73.08 current US$ per square kilometre Cuba
2000s 2,186 current US$ per square kilometre 259.54 current US$ per square kilometre 1,927 current US$ per square kilometre Cuba
2010s 706.54 current US$ per square kilometre 1,650 current US$ per square kilometre 943.87 current US$ per square kilometre Kyrgyzstan
2020s 2,305 current US$ per square kilometre 2,818 current US$ per square kilometre 513.08 current US$ per square kilometre Kyrgyzstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Cuba or Kyrgyzstan?
Cuba, at 3,895 current US$ per square kilometre against 3,773 current US$ per square kilometre in Kyrgyzstan as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Cuba and Kyrgyzstan?
122 current US$ per square kilometre, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Kyrgyzstan?
30 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2021.
How do Cuba and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
Cuba ranks 26th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 27th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Kyrgyzstan: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cuba/kyrgyz-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cuba/kyrgyz-republic/">Cuba vs Kyrgyzstan: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.