Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre in Jamaica
Jamaica: Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre was 47.60 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre in Jamaica, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current LCU per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre in Jamaica is 47.60 million current LCU per square kilometre, measured in 2023. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
That represents a change of up 6.2% on the previous year and up 137.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre in Jamaica peaked at 47.60 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 3,934 current LCU per square kilometre, in 1961.
That places Jamaica 18th out of 195 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre in Jamaica, year by year
| Year | current LCU per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 3,934 current LCU per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 4,017 current LCU per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1963 | 4,192 current LCU per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 1964 | 5,272 current LCU per square kilometre | +25.8% |
| 1965 | 5,623 current LCU per square kilometre | +6.7% |
| 1966 | 6,168 current LCU per square kilometre | +9.7% |
| 1967 | 8,089 current LCU per square kilometre | +31.1% |
| 1968 | 7,701 current LCU per square kilometre | -4.8% |
| 1969 | 8,070 current LCU per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 1970 | 9,030 current LCU per square kilometre | +11.9% |
| 1971 | 10,499 current LCU per square kilometre | +16.3% |
| 1972 | 11,579 current LCU per square kilometre | +10.3% |
| 1973 | 13,509 current LCU per square kilometre | +16.7% |
| 1974 | 16,584 current LCU per square kilometre | +22.8% |
| 1975 | 22,041 current LCU per square kilometre | +32.9% |
| 1976 | 21,856 current LCU per square kilometre | -0.8% |
| 1977 | 19,917 current LCU per square kilometre | -8.9% |
| 1978 | 25,106 current LCU per square kilometre | +26.1% |
| 1979 | 33,066 current LCU per square kilometre | +31.7% |
| 1980 | 43,278 current LCU per square kilometre | +30.9% |
| 1981 | 57,433 current LCU per square kilometre | +32.7% |
| 1982 | 67,608 current LCU per square kilometre | +17.7% |
| 1983 | 73,361 current LCU per square kilometre | +8.5% |
| 1984 | 102,881 current LCU per square kilometre | +40.2% |
| 1985 | 143,666 current LCU per square kilometre | +39.6% |
| 1986 | 188,513 current LCU per square kilometre | +31.2% |
| 1987 | 233,573 current LCU per square kilometre | +23.9% |
| 1988 | 256,260 current LCU per square kilometre | +9.7% |
| 1989 | 302,659 current LCU per square kilometre | +18.1% |
| 1990 | 358,199 current LCU per square kilometre | +18.4% |
| 1991 | 474,644 current LCU per square kilometre | +32.5% |
| 1992 | 929,908 current LCU per square kilometre | +95.9% |
| 1993 | 1.35 million current LCU per square kilometre | +45.7% |
| 1994 | 1.70 million current LCU per square kilometre | +25.4% |
| 1995 | 2.39 million current LCU per square kilometre | +40.7% |
| 1996 | 2.70 million current LCU per square kilometre | +13.1% |
| 1997 | 2.79 million current LCU per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 1998 | 3.27 million current LCU per square kilometre | +17.2% |
| 1999 | 3.66 million current LCU per square kilometre | +11.8% |
| 2000 | 4.07 million current LCU per square kilometre | +11.4% |
| 2001 | 4.53 million current LCU per square kilometre | +11.2% |
| 2002 | 4.94 million current LCU per square kilometre | +9.1% |
| 2003 | 6.18 million current LCU per square kilometre | +25.1% |
| 2004 | 7.33 million current LCU per square kilometre | +18.5% |
| 2005 | 8.18 million current LCU per square kilometre | +11.6% |
| 2006 | 9.39 million current LCU per square kilometre | +14.8% |
| 2007 | 10.93 million current LCU per square kilometre | +16.4% |
| 2008 | 12.08 million current LCU per square kilometre | +10.5% |
| 2009 | 12.61 million current LCU per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 2010 | 15.02 million current LCU per square kilometre | +19.1% |
| 2011 | 15.95 million current LCU per square kilometre | +6.2% |
| 2012 | 17.52 million current LCU per square kilometre | +9.8% |
| 2013 | 20.07 million current LCU per square kilometre | +14.6% |
| 2014 | 21.81 million current LCU per square kilometre | +8.6% |
| 2015 | 24.54 million current LCU per square kilometre | +12.5% |
| 2016 | 27.32 million current LCU per square kilometre | +11.3% |
| 2017 | 31.98 million current LCU per square kilometre | +17.1% |
| 2018 | 34.26 million current LCU per square kilometre | +7.1% |
| 2019 | 36.56 million current LCU per square kilometre | +6.7% |
| 2020 | 29.96 million current LCU per square kilometre | -18.1% |
| 2021 | 35.68 million current LCU per square kilometre | +19.1% |
| 2022 | 44.80 million current LCU per square kilometre | +25.5% |
| 2023 | 47.60 million current LCU per square kilometre | +6.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 5,896 current LCU per square kilometre | 3,934 current LCU per square kilometre | 8,089 current LCU per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 18,319 current LCU per square kilometre | 9,030 current LCU per square kilometre | 33,066 current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 146,923 current LCU per square kilometre | 43,278 current LCU per square kilometre | 302,659 current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 1.96 million current LCU per square kilometre | 358,199 current LCU per square kilometre | 3.66 million current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 8.02 million current LCU per square kilometre | 4.07 million current LCU per square kilometre | 12.61 million current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 24.50 million current LCU per square kilometre | 15.02 million current LCU per square kilometre | 36.56 million current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 39.51 million current LCU per square kilometre | 29.96 million current LCU per square kilometre | 47.60 million current LCU per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Jamaica
- 15 Paraguay 58.56 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 16 Maldives 49.62 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 17 Singapore 48.53 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 19 Mauritius 42.37 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 20 Tanzania, United Republic of 41.63 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 21 Burundi 39.89 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
More economy & growth data for Jamaica
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 1.76 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 1.6 Percent per annum (2029)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), annual 15.08 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per 13.91 current LCU per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per 111,319 current LCU per person (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) 2.93 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) 0.0497 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) 397.73 constant 2015 US$ per person (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) 2.93 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per 5.81 constant LCU per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre in Jamaica?
- Taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre in Jamaica was 47.60 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Jamaica?
- The highest recorded value was 47.60 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Jamaica?
- The lowest recorded value was 3,934 current LCU per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Jamaica rank for taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre?
- Jamaica ranks 18th out of 195 countries with data for 2023.
- Is taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre rising or falling in Jamaica?
- Over the last ten years it is up 137.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Jamaica data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Taxes less subsidies on products Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.