Jamaica vs Mauritius: Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre

Jamaica
47.60 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius
42.37 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Jamaica rank
18th
Mauritius rank
19th

Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Jamaica
  • Mauritius
010.0M20.0M30.0M40.0M50.0M196119922023

How they compare

Jamaica currently reports 47.60 million current LCU per square kilometre against 42.37 million current LCU per square kilometre in Mauritius, a difference of 5.23 million current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Jamaica's figure about 1.1 times Mauritius's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 48 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Mauritius ahead.

Jamaica ranks 18th and Mauritius ranks 19th of 195 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Jamaica averaged higher in 1 and Mauritius in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jamaica Mauritius Difference Ahead
1970s 24,986 current LCU per square kilometre 377,956 current LCU per square kilometre 352,970 current LCU per square kilometre Mauritius
1980s 146,923 current LCU per square kilometre 1.41 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.26 million current LCU per square kilometre Mauritius
1990s 1.96 million current LCU per square kilometre 4.41 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.44 million current LCU per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 8.02 million current LCU per square kilometre 11.22 million current LCU per square kilometre 3.19 million current LCU per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 24.50 million current LCU per square kilometre 25.28 million current LCU per square kilometre 781,170 current LCU per square kilometre Mauritius
2020s 39.51 million current LCU per square kilometre 33.24 million current LCU per square kilometre 6.27 million current LCU per square kilometre Jamaica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre, Jamaica or Mauritius?
Jamaica, at 47.60 million current LCU per square kilometre against 42.37 million current LCU per square kilometre in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre between Jamaica and Mauritius?
5.23 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Jamaica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Mauritius?
48 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2023.
How do Jamaica and Mauritius rank globally for taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Jamaica ranks 18th and Mauritius ranks 19th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jamaica vs Mauritius: Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/taxes-less-subsidies-on-products-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/jamaica/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/taxes-less-subsidies-on-products-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/jamaica/mauritius/">Jamaica vs Mauritius: Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
196 places, 7,867 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.