Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre in Finland
Finland: Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre was 8,278 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre in Finland, 1975–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Finland recorded 8,278 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre for secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre in 2023. That is the highest value across all 49 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 22.0% on the previous year and up 76.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre in Finland peaked at 8,278 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 90.9 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, in 1976.
That places Finland 134th out of 197 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre in Finland, year by year
| Year | BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1975 | 91.8 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1976 | 90.9 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | -1.0% |
| 1977 | 96.64 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +6.3% |
| 1978 | 123.04 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +27.3% |
| 1979 | 164.62 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +33.8% |
| 1980 | 222.68 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +35.3% |
| 1981 | 295.3 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +32.6% |
| 1982 | 283.67 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | -3.9% |
| 1983 | 256.33 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | -9.6% |
| 1984 | 275.62 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +7.5% |
| 1985 | 297.25 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +7.8% |
| 1986 | 271.27 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | -8.7% |
| 1987 | 365.63 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +34.8% |
| 1988 | 1,204 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +229.3% |
| 1989 | 729.23 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | -39.4% |
| 1990 | 946.82 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +29.8% |
| 1991 | 1,134 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +19.8% |
| 1992 | 1,402 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +23.7% |
| 1993 | 1,560 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +11.2% |
| 1994 | 1,346 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | -13.7% |
| 1995 | 5,044 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +274.8% |
| 1996 | 4,114 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | -18.4% |
| 1997 | 3,972 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | -3.5% |
| 1998 | 4,999 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +25.9% |
| 1999 | 5,443 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +8.9% |
| 2000 | 5,290 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | -2.8% |
| 2001 | 5,130 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | -3.0% |
| 2002 | 5,328 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 2003 | 6,279 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +17.8% |
| 2004 | 6,712 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +6.9% |
| 2005 | 6,523 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | -2.8% |
| 2006 | 3,539 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | -45.7% |
| 2007 | 4,151 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +17.3% |
| 2008 | 4,524 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +9.0% |
| 2009 | 4,000 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | -11.6% |
| 2010 | 4,196 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +4.9% |
| 2011 | 6,393 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +52.3% |
| 2012 | 6,470 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 2013 | 4,685 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | -27.6% |
| 2014 | 6,507 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +38.9% |
| 2015 | 4,794 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | -26.3% |
| 2016 | 5,144 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +7.3% |
| 2017 | 5,678 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +10.4% |
| 2018 | 6,265 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +10.3% |
| 2019 | 6,391 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 2020 | 5,963 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | -6.7% |
| 2021 | 6,725 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +12.8% |
| 2022 | 6,785 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 2023 | 8,278 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | +22.0% |
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre in Finland changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1995 | +274.8% | 1,346 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 5,044 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre |
| 1988 | +229.3% | 365.63 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 1,204 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 113.4 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 90.9 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 164.62 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 5 |
| 1980s | 420.12 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 222.68 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 1,204 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 2,996 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 946.82 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 5,443 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 5,148 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 3,539 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 6,712 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 5,652 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 4,196 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 6,507 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 6,938 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 5,963 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 8,278 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Finland
- 131 New Zealand 10,500 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 132 Yemen 10,047 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 133 Zimbabwe 8,523 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 135 Chile 8,138 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 136 Indonesia 8,065 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 137 Belize 7,926 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre compare
More economy & growth data for Finland
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 1.48 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 1.51 Percent per annum (2029)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), gaps 6.68 billion BoP, current US$ (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.0211 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 1,183 BoP, current US$ per person (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled -285.87 million BoP, current US$ (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), annual -103.27 % change on previous year (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per unit -0.0009 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per capita -50.63 BoP, current US$ per person (2025)
- Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), annual growth rate 24.81 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre in Finland?
- Secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre in Finland was 8,278 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre recorded in Finland?
- The highest recorded value was 8,278 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre recorded in Finland?
- The lowest recorded value was 90.9 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in 1976.
- How does Finland rank for secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
- Finland ranks 134th out of 197 countries with data for 2023.
- Is secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre rising or falling in Finland?
- Over the last ten years it is up 76.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Finland data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 49 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Secondary income receipts Balance of Payments Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.