Finland vs Zimbabwe: Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Finland
8,278 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
8,523 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Finland rank
134th
Zimbabwe rank
133rd
Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time
- Finland
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 8,523 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 8,278 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Finland, a difference of 245 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Finland ahead.
Finland ranks 134th and Zimbabwe ranks 133rd of 197 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 5 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 128.1 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 77.74 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 50.36 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | Finland |
| 1980s | 420.12 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 415.17 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 4.95 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | Finland |
| 1990s | 1,278 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 559.24 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 718.45 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | Finland |
| 2000s | 4,000 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 3,111 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 889.11 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | Finland |
| 2010s | 5,652 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 4,570 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 1,082 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | Finland |
| 2020s | 6,938 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 6,964 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | 26.49 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Finland or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 8,523 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 8,278 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Finland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Finland and Zimbabwe?
- 245 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Zimbabwe?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2023.
- How do Finland and Zimbabwe rank globally for secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
- Finland ranks 134th and Zimbabwe ranks 133rd of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.