Chile vs Finland: Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Chile
8,138 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Finland
8,278 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
135th
Finland rank
134th

Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Chile
  • Finland
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k197519992023

How they compare

Finland currently reports 8,278 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 8,138 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 140 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Finland ahead.

Chile ranks 135th and Finland ranks 134th of 197 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and Finland in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Finland Difference Ahead
1970s 118.08 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 113.4 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 4.68 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Chile
1980s 266.63 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 420.12 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 153.48 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Finland
1990s 808.17 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2,996 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2,188 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Finland
2000s 2,857 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 5,148 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2,291 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Finland
2010s 5,633 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 5,652 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 19.3 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Finland
2020s 6,954 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 6,938 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 15.9 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Chile or Finland?
Finland, at 8,278 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 8,138 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Chile and Finland?
140 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Finland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Finland?
49 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2023.
How do Chile and Finland rank globally for secondary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Chile ranks 135th and Finland ranks 134th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Finland: Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 20 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-income-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/finland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/secondary-income-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/finland/">Chile vs Finland: Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
244 places, 8,812 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.