Manufacturing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of
Tanzania, United Republic of: Manufacturing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre was 17.86 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Manufacturing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of, 1990–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current LCU per square kilometre.
Analysis
Tanzania, United Republic of recorded 17.86 million current LCU per square kilometre for manufacturing, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre in 2023. That is the highest value across all 34 years on record.
That represents a change of up 10.8% on the previous year and up 137.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, manufacturing, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of peaked at 17.86 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 79,558 current LCU per square kilometre, in 1990.
That places Tanzania, United Republic of 36th out of 200 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Manufacturing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of, year by year
| Year | current LCU per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1990 | 79,558 current LCU per square kilometre | — |
| 1991 | 100,158 current LCU per square kilometre | +25.9% |
| 1992 | 118,073 current LCU per square kilometre | +17.9% |
| 1993 | 136,012 current LCU per square kilometre | +15.2% |
| 1994 | 177,743 current LCU per square kilometre | +30.7% |
| 1995 | 226,377 current LCU per square kilometre | +27.4% |
| 1996 | 287,114 current LCU per square kilometre | +26.8% |
| 1997 | 333,339 current LCU per square kilometre | +16.1% |
| 1998 | 1.01 million current LCU per square kilometre | +203.4% |
| 1999 | 1.09 million current LCU per square kilometre | +8.1% |
| 2000 | 1.19 million current LCU per square kilometre | +9.0% |
| 2001 | 1.27 million current LCU per square kilometre | +6.8% |
| 2002 | 1.45 million current LCU per square kilometre | +13.6% |
| 2003 | 1.67 million current LCU per square kilometre | +15.8% |
| 2004 | 1.88 million current LCU per square kilometre | +12.6% |
| 2005 | 2.12 million current LCU per square kilometre | +12.3% |
| 2006 | 2.33 million current LCU per square kilometre | +9.8% |
| 2007 | 2.71 million current LCU per square kilometre | +16.4% |
| 2008 | 3.30 million current LCU per square kilometre | +22.0% |
| 2009 | 3.76 million current LCU per square kilometre | +13.8% |
| 2010 | 4.37 million current LCU per square kilometre | +16.4% |
| 2011 | 5.82 million current LCU per square kilometre | +33.1% |
| 2012 | 6.64 million current LCU per square kilometre | +14.1% |
| 2013 | 7.51 million current LCU per square kilometre | +13.0% |
| 2014 | 8.50 million current LCU per square kilometre | +13.3% |
| 2015 | 8.37 million current LCU per square kilometre | -1.6% |
| 2016 | 9.56 million current LCU per square kilometre | +14.2% |
| 2017 | 10.28 million current LCU per square kilometre | +7.5% |
| 2018 | 11.76 million current LCU per square kilometre | +14.5% |
| 2019 | 13.40 million current LCU per square kilometre | +13.9% |
| 2020 | 13.74 million current LCU per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 2021 | 14.71 million current LCU per square kilometre | +7.0% |
| 2022 | 16.12 million current LCU per square kilometre | +9.6% |
| 2023 | 17.86 million current LCU per square kilometre | +10.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 356,239 current LCU per square kilometre | 79,558 current LCU per square kilometre | 1.09 million current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 2.17 million current LCU per square kilometre | 1.19 million current LCU per square kilometre | 3.76 million current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 8.62 million current LCU per square kilometre | 4.37 million current LCU per square kilometre | 13.40 million current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 15.61 million current LCU per square kilometre | 13.74 million current LCU per square kilometre | 17.86 million current LCU per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Tanzania, United Republic of
- 33 Malawi 21.07 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 34 Côte d'Ivoire 20.43 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 35 Czechia 20.28 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 37 Dominican Republic 17.58 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 38 Madagascar 15.89 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 39 Liechtenstein 15.81 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
More economy & growth data for Tanzania, United Republic of
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 3.67 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 6.5 Percent per annum (2029)
- Manufacturing, value added (current US$), per unit of GDP 0.084 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2023)
- Manufacturing, value added (current US$), per capita 99.63 current US$ per person (2023)
- Manufacturing, value added (current LCU), per unit of GDP 200.14 current LCU per US$ of GDP (2023)
- Manufacturing, value added (current LCU), per capita 237,434 current LCU per person (2023)
- Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP 0.076 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP (2023)
- Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per capita 90.13 constant 2015 US$ per person (2023)
- Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU), per capita 179,360 constant LCU per person (2023)
- Industry (including construction), value added (current US$), annual 18.61 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is manufacturing, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Manufacturing, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of was 17.86 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest manufacturing, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Tanzania, United Republic of?
- The highest recorded value was 17.86 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest manufacturing, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Tanzania, United Republic of?
- The lowest recorded value was 79,558 current LCU per square kilometre in 1990.
- How does Tanzania, United Republic of rank for manufacturing, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre?
- Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 36th out of 200 countries with data for 2023.
- Is manufacturing, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre rising or falling in Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Over the last ten years it is up 137.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Tanzania, United Republic of data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Manufacturing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 34 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Manufacturing, value added (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Manufacturing, value added (current LCU) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Manufacturing, value added Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Manufacturing, value added (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.