Manufacturing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre in Dominican Republic
Dominican Republic: Manufacturing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre was 17.58 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
17.58 million current LCU per square kilometre
Change on year
up 1.3%
World rank
37th
of 200 countries
All-time high
17.58 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
All-time low
2,859 current LCU per square kilometre
in 1965
Years of data
59
1965–2023
Manufacturing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre in Dominican Republic, 1965–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current LCU per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for manufacturing, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre in Dominican Republic is 17.58 million current LCU per square kilometre, measured in 2023. That is the highest value across all 59 years on record.
That represents a change of up 1.3% on the previous year and up 142.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, manufacturing, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre in Dominican Republic peaked at 17.58 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 2,859 current LCU per square kilometre, in 1965.
Dominican Republic ranks 37th of 200 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Manufacturing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre in Dominican Republic, year by year
| Year | current LCU per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1965 | 2,859 current LCU per square kilometre | — |
| 1966 | 3,699 current LCU per square kilometre | +29.4% |
| 1967 | 4,119 current LCU per square kilometre | +11.4% |
| 1968 | 3,912 current LCU per square kilometre | -5.0% |
| 1969 | 4,755 current LCU per square kilometre | +21.5% |
| 1970 | 5,701 current LCU per square kilometre | +19.9% |
| 1971 | 6,338 current LCU per square kilometre | +11.2% |
| 1972 | 7,189 current LCU per square kilometre | +13.4% |
| 1973 | 8,257 current LCU per square kilometre | +14.9% |
| 1974 | 11,277 current LCU per square kilometre | +36.6% |
| 1975 | 15,568 current LCU per square kilometre | +38.1% |
| 1976 | 16,866 current LCU per square kilometre | +8.3% |
| 1977 | 18,021 current LCU per square kilometre | +6.8% |
| 1978 | 18,085 current LCU per square kilometre | +0.4% |
| 1979 | 19,222 current LCU per square kilometre | +6.3% |
| 1980 | 21,010 current LCU per square kilometre | +9.3% |
| 1981 | 23,453 current LCU per square kilometre | +11.6% |
| 1982 | 30,118 current LCU per square kilometre | +28.4% |
| 1983 | 31,608 current LCU per square kilometre | +4.9% |
| 1984 | 35,355 current LCU per square kilometre | +11.9% |
| 1985 | 39,847 current LCU per square kilometre | +12.7% |
| 1986 | 46,657 current LCU per square kilometre | +17.1% |
| 1987 | 59,325 current LCU per square kilometre | +27.2% |
| 1988 | 82,364 current LCU per square kilometre | +38.8% |
| 1989 | 155,044 current LCU per square kilometre | +88.2% |
| 1990 | 224,183 current LCU per square kilometre | +44.6% |
| 1991 | 670,453 current LCU per square kilometre | +199.1% |
| 1992 | 735,458 current LCU per square kilometre | +9.7% |
| 1993 | 795,030 current LCU per square kilometre | +8.1% |
| 1994 | 879,242 current LCU per square kilometre | +10.6% |
| 1995 | 962,347 current LCU per square kilometre | +9.5% |
| 1996 | 1.11 million current LCU per square kilometre | +14.9% |
| 1997 | 1.26 million current LCU per square kilometre | +14.1% |
| 1998 | 1.43 million current LCU per square kilometre | +13.2% |
| 1999 | 1.57 million current LCU per square kilometre | +10.1% |
| 2000 | 1.71 million current LCU per square kilometre | +8.6% |
| 2001 | 1.74 million current LCU per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 2002 | 2.01 million current LCU per square kilometre | +15.7% |
| 2003 | 2.83 million current LCU per square kilometre | +40.6% |
| 2004 | 4.18 million current LCU per square kilometre | +47.7% |
| 2005 | 4.12 million current LCU per square kilometre | -1.4% |
| 2006 | 4.58 million current LCU per square kilometre | +11.1% |
| 2007 | 4.90 million current LCU per square kilometre | +7.0% |
| 2008 | 5.49 million current LCU per square kilometre | +12.1% |
| 2009 | 5.37 million current LCU per square kilometre | -2.3% |
| 2010 | 6.00 million current LCU per square kilometre | +11.8% |
| 2011 | 6.50 million current LCU per square kilometre | +8.4% |
| 2012 | 6.88 million current LCU per square kilometre | +5.9% |
| 2013 | 7.25 million current LCU per square kilometre | +5.3% |
| 2014 | 7.95 million current LCU per square kilometre | +9.6% |
| 2015 | 8.68 million current LCU per square kilometre | +9.2% |
| 2016 | 9.14 million current LCU per square kilometre | +5.3% |
| 2017 | 9.57 million current LCU per square kilometre | +4.7% |
| 2018 | 10.54 million current LCU per square kilometre | +10.2% |
| 2019 | 11.50 million current LCU per square kilometre | +9.1% |
| 2020 | 11.93 million current LCU per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 2021 | 15.40 million current LCU per square kilometre | +29.1% |
| 2022 | 17.36 million current LCU per square kilometre | +12.7% |
| 2023 | 17.58 million current LCU per square kilometre | +1.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3,869 current LCU per square kilometre | 2,859 current LCU per square kilometre | 4,755 current LCU per square kilometre | 5 |
| 1970s | 12,652 current LCU per square kilometre | 5,701 current LCU per square kilometre | 19,222 current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 52,478 current LCU per square kilometre | 21,010 current LCU per square kilometre | 155,044 current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 963,437 current LCU per square kilometre | 224,183 current LCU per square kilometre | 1.57 million current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 3.69 million current LCU per square kilometre | 1.71 million current LCU per square kilometre | 5.49 million current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 8.40 million current LCU per square kilometre | 6.00 million current LCU per square kilometre | 11.50 million current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 15.57 million current LCU per square kilometre | 11.93 million current LCU per square kilometre | 17.58 million current LCU per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Dominican Republic
- 34 Côte d'Ivoire 20.43 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 35 Czechia 20.28 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 36 Tanzania, United Republic of 17.86 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 38 Madagascar 15.89 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 39 Liechtenstein 15.81 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 40 Pakistan 14.81 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
More economy & growth data for Dominican Republic
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 4.27 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 5.04 Percent per annum (2029)
- Manufacturing, value added (current US$), per unit of GDP 0.1226 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Manufacturing, value added (current US$), per capita 1,356 current US$ per person (2025)
- Manufacturing, value added (current LCU), per unit of GDP 7.6 current LCU per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Manufacturing, value added (current LCU), per capita 84,076 current LCU per person (2025)
- Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP 0.0983 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per capita 1,087 constant 2015 US$ per person (2025)
- Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU), per capita 55,268 constant LCU per person (2025)
- Industry (including construction), value added (current US$), annual 1.42 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is manufacturing, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre in Dominican Republic?
- Manufacturing, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre in Dominican Republic was 17.58 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest manufacturing, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Dominican Republic?
- The highest recorded value was 17.58 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest manufacturing, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Dominican Republic?
- The lowest recorded value was 2,859 current LCU per square kilometre in 1965.
- How does Dominican Republic rank for manufacturing, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre?
- Dominican Republic ranks 37th out of 200 countries with data for 2023.
- Is manufacturing, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre rising or falling in Dominican Republic?
- Over the last ten years it is up 142.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Dominican Republic data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Manufacturing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 59 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Manufacturing, value added (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Manufacturing, value added (current LCU) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Manufacturing, value added Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Manufacturing, value added (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.