Czechia vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Manufacturing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre

Czechia
20.28 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of
17.86 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Czechia rank
35th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
36th

Manufacturing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Czechia
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
05.0M10.0M15.0M20.0M199020062023

How they compare

Czechia currently reports 20.28 million current LCU per square kilometre against 17.86 million current LCU per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 2.43 million current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Czechia's figure about 1.1 times Tanzania, United Republic of's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Czechia has been ahead every year.

Czechia ranks 35th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 36th of 200 countries.

Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Czechia Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1990s 5.09 million current LCU per square kilometre 466,372 current LCU per square kilometre 4.62 million current LCU per square kilometre Czechia
2000s 9.35 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.17 million current LCU per square kilometre 7.18 million current LCU per square kilometre Czechia
2010s 13.65 million current LCU per square kilometre 8.62 million current LCU per square kilometre 5.03 million current LCU per square kilometre Czechia
2020s 17.44 million current LCU per square kilometre 15.61 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.83 million current LCU per square kilometre Czechia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher manufacturing, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre, Czechia or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Czechia, at 20.28 million current LCU per square kilometre against 17.86 million current LCU per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2023.
What is the difference in manufacturing, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre between Czechia and Tanzania, United Republic of?
2.43 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Czechia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Tanzania, United Republic of?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Czechia and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for manufacturing, value added (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Czechia ranks 35th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 36th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Manufacturing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Czechia vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Manufacturing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/czechia/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/manufacturing-value-added-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/czechia/tanzania/">Czechia vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Manufacturing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Manufacturing, value added (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 7,774 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Manufacturing, value added (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.