Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per in Tanzania
Tanzania: Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per was 45.54 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per in Tanzania, 1990–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in constant LCU per square kilometre.
Analysis
Tanzania recorded 45.54 million constant LCU per square kilometre for industry (including construction), value added (constant lcu), per in 2023. That is the highest value across all 34 years on record.
That represents a change of up 4.8% on the previous year and up 103.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, industry (including construction), value added (constant lcu), per in Tanzania peaked at 45.54 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 5.20 million constant LCU per square kilometre, in 1995.
Tanzania ranks 27th of 196 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per in Tanzania, year by year
| Year | constant LCU per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1990 | 5.42 million constant LCU per square kilometre | — |
| 1991 | 5.43 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.2% |
| 1992 | 5.43 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 5.22 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -3.9% |
| 1994 | 5.30 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1995 | 5.20 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -1.9% |
| 1996 | 5.55 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.7% |
| 1997 | 5.92 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.7% |
| 1998 | 6.53 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +10.3% |
| 1999 | 7.02 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.5% |
| 2000 | 7.33 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 2001 | 7.87 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.4% |
| 2002 | 8.71 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +10.6% |
| 2003 | 9.78 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +12.3% |
| 2004 | 10.96 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +12.1% |
| 2005 | 12.14 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +10.8% |
| 2006 | 13.30 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +9.6% |
| 2007 | 14.55 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +9.4% |
| 2008 | 15.43 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.1% |
| 2009 | 15.96 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 2010 | 17.42 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +9.2% |
| 2011 | 19.48 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +11.8% |
| 2012 | 20.31 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 2013 | 22.43 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +10.5% |
| 2014 | 23.77 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.0% |
| 2015 | 26.08 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +9.7% |
| 2016 | 29.15 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +11.7% |
| 2017 | 32.25 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +10.6% |
| 2018 | 35.39 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +9.7% |
| 2019 | 39.04 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +10.3% |
| 2020 | 40.03 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 2021 | 41.67 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 2022 | 43.46 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.3% |
| 2023 | 45.54 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5.70 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 5.20 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 7.02 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 11.60 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 7.33 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 15.96 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 26.53 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 17.42 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 39.04 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 42.67 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 40.03 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 45.54 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Tanzania
- 24 Chile 68.56 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 25 Armenia 59.29 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 26 Sri Lanka 48.54 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 28 Myanmar 44.70 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 29 Mauritius 44.68 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 30 Nigeria 37.98 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
More economy & growth data for Tanzania
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 3.67 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 6.5 Percent per annum (2029)
- Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$) 7.8 % change on previous year (2025)
- Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$) 0.2556 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$) 326.56 constant 2015 US$ per person (2025)
- Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), annual 7.8 % change on previous year (2025)
- Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per 508.54 constant LCU per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per 649,817 constant LCU per person (2025)
- Services, value added (current US$), annual growth rate 10.66 % change on previous year (2025)
- Services, value added (current US$), per unit of GDP 0.2876 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is industry (including construction), value added (constant lcu), per in Tanzania?
- Industry (including construction), value added (constant lcu), per in Tanzania was 45.54 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest industry (including construction), value added (constant lcu), per recorded in Tanzania?
- The highest recorded value was 45.54 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest industry (including construction), value added (constant lcu), per recorded in Tanzania?
- The lowest recorded value was 5.20 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 1995.
- How does Tanzania rank for industry (including construction), value added (constant lcu), per?
- Tanzania ranks 27th out of 196 countries with data for 2023.
- Is industry (including construction), value added (constant lcu), per rising or falling in Tanzania?
- Over the last ten years it is up 103.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Tanzania data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 34 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Industry (including construction), value added Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.