Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per in Chile

Chile: Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per was 68.56 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising

Latest (2023)
68.56 million constant LCU per square kilometre
Change on year
up 2.5%
World rank
24th
of 196 countries
All-time high
71.10 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2018
All-time low
13.71 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023

Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per in Chile, 1961–2023

20.0M40.0M60.0M80.0M196119922023

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in constant LCU per square kilometre.

Analysis

In 2023, industry (including construction), value added (constant lcu), per in Chile stood at 68.56 million constant LCU per square kilometre.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 2.5% on the previous year and up 2.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, industry (including construction), value added (constant lcu), per in Chile peaked at 71.10 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 2018 and was at its lowest, 13.71 million constant LCU per square kilometre, in 1961.

Chile ranks 24th of 196 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.

Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per in Chile, year by year

Annual values for Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Chile, 1961 to 2023.
Year constant LCU per square kilometre Change
1961 13.71 million constant LCU per square kilometre
1962 15.41 million constant LCU per square kilometre +12.4%
1963 16.58 million constant LCU per square kilometre +7.6%
1964 16.81 million constant LCU per square kilometre +1.4%
1965 16.82 million constant LCU per square kilometre +0.1%
1966 18.11 million constant LCU per square kilometre +7.6%
1967 18.59 million constant LCU per square kilometre +2.7%
1968 19.35 million constant LCU per square kilometre +4.1%
1969 20.08 million constant LCU per square kilometre +3.8%
1970 20.46 million constant LCU per square kilometre +1.9%
1971 22.49 million constant LCU per square kilometre +9.9%
1972 22.00 million constant LCU per square kilometre -2.2%
1973 20.44 million constant LCU per square kilometre -7.1%
1974 21.60 million constant LCU per square kilometre +5.7%
1975 16.89 million constant LCU per square kilometre -21.8%
1976 17.55 million constant LCU per square kilometre +3.9%
1977 18.58 million constant LCU per square kilometre +5.9%
1978 19.93 million constant LCU per square kilometre +7.3%
1979 21.75 million constant LCU per square kilometre +9.1%
1980 23.53 million constant LCU per square kilometre +8.2%
1981 25.01 million constant LCU per square kilometre +6.3%
1982 21.33 million constant LCU per square kilometre -14.7%
1983 21.17 million constant LCU per square kilometre -0.8%
1984 22.67 million constant LCU per square kilometre +7.1%
1985 23.74 million constant LCU per square kilometre +4.8%
1986 25.12 million constant LCU per square kilometre +5.8%
1987 26.18 million constant LCU per square kilometre +4.2%
1988 28.34 million constant LCU per square kilometre +8.3%
1989 30.81 million constant LCU per square kilometre +8.7%
1990 31.33 million constant LCU per square kilometre +1.7%
1991 33.64 million constant LCU per square kilometre +7.4%
1992 36.75 million constant LCU per square kilometre +9.2%
1993 39.55 million constant LCU per square kilometre +7.6%
1994 41.33 million constant LCU per square kilometre +4.5%
1995 44.78 million constant LCU per square kilometre +8.4%
1996 49.35 million constant LCU per square kilometre +10.2%
1997 52.21 million constant LCU per square kilometre +5.8%
1998 52.83 million constant LCU per square kilometre +1.2%
1999 51.70 million constant LCU per square kilometre -2.1%
2000 53.26 million constant LCU per square kilometre +3.0%
2001 53.88 million constant LCU per square kilometre +1.2%
2002 53.89 million constant LCU per square kilometre +0.0%
2003 54.99 million constant LCU per square kilometre +2.0%
2004 56.77 million constant LCU per square kilometre +3.2%
2005 57.63 million constant LCU per square kilometre +1.5%
2006 59.44 million constant LCU per square kilometre +3.1%
2007 59.61 million constant LCU per square kilometre +0.3%
2008 59.01 million constant LCU per square kilometre -1.0%
2009 58.02 million constant LCU per square kilometre -1.7%
2010 59.28 million constant LCU per square kilometre +2.2%
2011 60.76 million constant LCU per square kilometre +2.5%
2012 64.59 million constant LCU per square kilometre +6.3%
2013 66.73 million constant LCU per square kilometre +3.3%
2014 67.47 million constant LCU per square kilometre +1.1%
2015 68.25 million constant LCU per square kilometre +1.2%
2016 67.97 million constant LCU per square kilometre -0.4%
2017 67.64 million constant LCU per square kilometre -0.5%
2018 71.10 million constant LCU per square kilometre +5.1%
2019 70.40 million constant LCU per square kilometre -1.0%
2020 67.99 million constant LCU per square kilometre -3.4%
2021 68.85 million constant LCU per square kilometre +1.3%
2022 66.89 million constant LCU per square kilometre -2.8%
2023 68.56 million constant LCU per square kilometre +2.5%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 17.27 million constant LCU per square kilometre 13.71 million constant LCU per square kilometre 20.08 million constant LCU per square kilometre 9
1970s 20.17 million constant LCU per square kilometre 16.89 million constant LCU per square kilometre 22.49 million constant LCU per square kilometre 10
1980s 24.79 million constant LCU per square kilometre 21.17 million constant LCU per square kilometre 30.81 million constant LCU per square kilometre 10
1990s 43.35 million constant LCU per square kilometre 31.33 million constant LCU per square kilometre 52.83 million constant LCU per square kilometre 10
2000s 56.65 million constant LCU per square kilometre 53.26 million constant LCU per square kilometre 59.61 million constant LCU per square kilometre 10
2010s 66.42 million constant LCU per square kilometre 59.28 million constant LCU per square kilometre 71.10 million constant LCU per square kilometre 10
2020s 68.07 million constant LCU per square kilometre 66.89 million constant LCU per square kilometre 68.85 million constant LCU per square kilometre 4

Countries ranked near Chile

  1. 21 Guinea 114.56 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
  2. 22 Bangladesh 89.90 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
  3. 23 Equatorial Guinea 89.33 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
  4. 25 Armenia 59.29 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
  5. 26 Sri Lanka 48.54 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
  6. 27 Tanzania 45.54 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare

See the full ranking of 197 places →

More economy & growth data for Chile

All data for Chile →

Frequently asked questions

What is industry (including construction), value added (constant lcu), per in Chile?
Industry (including construction), value added (constant lcu), per in Chile was 68.56 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest industry (including construction), value added (constant lcu), per recorded in Chile?
The highest recorded value was 71.10 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 2018.
What is the lowest industry (including construction), value added (constant lcu), per recorded in Chile?
The lowest recorded value was 13.71 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 1961.
How does Chile rank for industry (including construction), value added (constant lcu), per?
Chile ranks 24th out of 196 countries with data for 2023.
Is industry (including construction), value added (constant lcu), per rising or falling in Chile?
Over the last ten years it is up 2.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Chile data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per in Chile. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/stat/industry-including-construction-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/stat/industry-including-construction-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/chile/">Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per in Chile</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.

Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU) ÷ Land area (sq. km)

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
197 places, 7,775 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.