Myanmar vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per

Myanmar
44.70 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of
45.54 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Myanmar rank
28th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
27th

Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per over time

  • Myanmar
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
010.0M20.0M30.0M40.0M50.0M199020062023

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 45.54 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 44.70 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Myanmar, a difference of 842,200 constant LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.

Myanmar ranks 28th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 27th of 196 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Myanmar averaged higher in 2 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Myanmar Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
2000s 8.43 million constant LCU per square kilometre 11.60 million constant LCU per square kilometre 3.17 million constant LCU per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s 35.53 million constant LCU per square kilometre 26.53 million constant LCU per square kilometre 9.00 million constant LCU per square kilometre Myanmar
2020s 43.96 million constant LCU per square kilometre 42.67 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.29 million constant LCU per square kilometre Myanmar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher industry (including construction), value added (constant lcu), per, Myanmar or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 45.54 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 44.70 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Myanmar as of 2023.
What is the difference in industry (including construction), value added (constant lcu), per between Myanmar and Tanzania, United Republic of?
842,200 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Tanzania, United Republic of?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Myanmar and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for industry (including construction), value added (constant lcu), per?
Myanmar ranks 28th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 27th of 196 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Myanmar vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/myanmar/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/industry-including-construction-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/myanmar/tanzania/">Myanmar vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
197 places, 7,775 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.