Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Brazil
Brazil: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre was 91,429 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Latest (2023)
91,429 constant LCU per square kilometre
Change on year
down 3.0%
World rank
141st
of 165 countries
All-time high
108,778 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2013
All-time low
23,549 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 1970
Years of data
54
1970–2023
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Brazil, 1970–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in constant LCU per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Brazil is 91,429 constant LCU per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 3.0% on the previous year and down 15.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Brazil peaked at 108,778 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2013 and was at its lowest, 23,549 constant LCU per square kilometre, in 1970.
Brazil ranks 141st of 165 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 54 years of available data.
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Brazil, year by year
| Year | constant LCU per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 23,549 constant LCU per square kilometre | — |
| 1971 | 27,163 constant LCU per square kilometre | +15.3% |
| 1972 | 31,704 constant LCU per square kilometre | +16.7% |
| 1973 | 38,359 constant LCU per square kilometre | +21.0% |
| 1974 | 43,444 constant LCU per square kilometre | +13.3% |
| 1975 | 47,673 constant LCU per square kilometre | +9.7% |
| 1976 | 51,023 constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.0% |
| 1977 | 50,426 constant LCU per square kilometre | -1.2% |
| 1978 | 52,820 constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.7% |
| 1979 | 54,872 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 1980 | 47,785 constant LCU per square kilometre | -12.9% |
| 1981 | 47,174 constant LCU per square kilometre | -1.3% |
| 1982 | 44,934 constant LCU per square kilometre | -4.7% |
| 1983 | 37,631 constant LCU per square kilometre | -16.3% |
| 1984 | 37,574 constant LCU per square kilometre | -0.2% |
| 1985 | 38,634 constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1986 | 46,167 constant LCU per square kilometre | +19.5% |
| 1987 | 55,377 constant LCU per square kilometre | +19.9% |
| 1988 | 58,286 constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.3% |
| 1989 | 66,427 constant LCU per square kilometre | +14.0% |
| 1990 | 48,968 constant LCU per square kilometre | -26.3% |
| 1991 | 43,357 constant LCU per square kilometre | -11.5% |
| 1992 | 43,903 constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 1993 | 48,096 constant LCU per square kilometre | +9.5% |
| 1994 | 54,510 constant LCU per square kilometre | +13.3% |
| 1995 | 55,651 constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1996 | 56,316 constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 1997 | 61,057 constant LCU per square kilometre | +8.4% |
| 1998 | 60,957 constant LCU per square kilometre | -0.2% |
| 1999 | 55,547 constant LCU per square kilometre | -8.9% |
| 2000 | 58,220 constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 2001 | 58,980 constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 2002 | 58,128 constant LCU per square kilometre | -1.4% |
| 2003 | 55,812 constant LCU per square kilometre | -4.0% |
| 2004 | 60,549 constant LCU per square kilometre | +8.5% |
| 2005 | 61,733 constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 2006 | 65,845 constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.7% |
| 2007 | 73,715 constant LCU per square kilometre | +12.0% |
| 2008 | 82,773 constant LCU per square kilometre | +12.3% |
| 2009 | 81,006 constant LCU per square kilometre | -2.1% |
| 2010 | 95,469 constant LCU per square kilometre | +17.9% |
| 2011 | 101,994 constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.8% |
| 2012 | 102,788 constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.8% |
| 2013 | 108,778 constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.8% |
| 2014 | 104,183 constant LCU per square kilometre | -4.2% |
| 2015 | 89,653 constant LCU per square kilometre | -13.9% |
| 2016 | 78,778 constant LCU per square kilometre | -12.1% |
| 2017 | 76,764 constant LCU per square kilometre | -2.6% |
| 2018 | 80,780 constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 2019 | 84,032 constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 2020 | 82,564 constant LCU per square kilometre | -1.7% |
| 2021 | 93,220 constant LCU per square kilometre | +12.9% |
| 2022 | 94,236 constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 2023 | 91,429 constant LCU per square kilometre | -3.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 42,103 constant LCU per square kilometre | 23,549 constant LCU per square kilometre | 54,872 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 47,999 constant LCU per square kilometre | 37,574 constant LCU per square kilometre | 66,427 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 52,836 constant LCU per square kilometre | 43,357 constant LCU per square kilometre | 61,057 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 65,676 constant LCU per square kilometre | 55,812 constant LCU per square kilometre | 82,773 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 92,322 constant LCU per square kilometre | 76,764 constant LCU per square kilometre | 108,778 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 90,362 constant LCU per square kilometre | 82,564 constant LCU per square kilometre | 94,236 constant LCU per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Brazil
- 138 Bulgaria 118,162 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 139 Tunisia 106,623 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 140 Peru 100,717 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 142 Montenegro 88,091 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 143 Solomon Islands 87,409 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 144 Ecuador 86,311 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
More economy & growth data for Brazil
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 1.56 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 2 Percent per annum (2029)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), gaps 30.18 billion BoP, current US$ (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.0132 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 141.79 BoP, current US$ per person (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled 77.68 billion BoP, current US$ (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), annual 4.84 % change on previous year (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.0341 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 365 BoP, current US$ per person (2025)
- Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), annual growth rate 8.73 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Brazil?
- Gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Brazil was 91,429 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Brazil?
- The highest recorded value was 108,778 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2013.
- What is the lowest gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Brazil?
- The lowest recorded value was 23,549 constant LCU per square kilometre in 1970.
- How does Brazil rank for gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
- Brazil ranks 141st out of 165 countries with data for 2023.
- Is gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre rising or falling in Brazil?
- Over the last ten years it is down 15.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Brazil data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 54 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Gross fixed capital formation Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.