Brazil vs Ecuador: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Brazil
91,429 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador
86,311 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil rank
141st
Ecuador rank
144th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Brazil
  • Ecuador
20.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k196119922023

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 91,429 constant LCU per square kilometre against 86,311 constant LCU per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 5,118 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Brazil's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Brazil ahead.

Brazil ranks 141st and Ecuador ranks 144th of 165 countries.

Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Ecuador Difference Ahead
1970s 42,103 constant LCU per square kilometre 34,905 constant LCU per square kilometre 7,199 constant LCU per square kilometre Brazil
1980s 47,999 constant LCU per square kilometre 45,651 constant LCU per square kilometre 2,348 constant LCU per square kilometre Brazil
1990s 52,836 constant LCU per square kilometre 41,508 constant LCU per square kilometre 11,328 constant LCU per square kilometre Brazil
2000s 65,676 constant LCU per square kilometre 47,901 constant LCU per square kilometre 17,775 constant LCU per square kilometre Brazil
2010s 92,322 constant LCU per square kilometre 89,104 constant LCU per square kilometre 3,218 constant LCU per square kilometre Brazil
2020s 90,362 constant LCU per square kilometre 80,219 constant LCU per square kilometre 10,144 constant LCU per square kilometre Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Brazil or Ecuador?
Brazil, at 91,429 constant LCU per square kilometre against 86,311 constant LCU per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Brazil and Ecuador?
5,118 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Ecuador?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Ecuador rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Brazil ranks 141st and Ecuador ranks 144th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Ecuador: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/brazil/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/brazil/ecuador/">Brazil vs Ecuador: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 6,527 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.