Brazil vs Tunisia: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Brazil
91,429 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
106,623 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil rank
141st
Tunisia rank
139th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Brazil
  • Tunisia
25.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k125.0k196519942023

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 106,623 constant LCU per square kilometre against 91,429 constant LCU per square kilometre in Brazil, a difference of 15,194 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.2 times Brazil's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Brazil ahead.

Brazil ranks 141st and Tunisia ranks 139th of 165 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 3 and Tunisia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Tunisia Difference Ahead
1970s 42,103 constant LCU per square kilometre 25,842 constant LCU per square kilometre 16,261 constant LCU per square kilometre Brazil
1980s 47,999 constant LCU per square kilometre 40,095 constant LCU per square kilometre 7,904 constant LCU per square kilometre Brazil
1990s 52,836 constant LCU per square kilometre 52,494 constant LCU per square kilometre 341.59 constant LCU per square kilometre Brazil
2000s 65,676 constant LCU per square kilometre 79,612 constant LCU per square kilometre 13,936 constant LCU per square kilometre Tunisia
2010s 92,322 constant LCU per square kilometre 124,201 constant LCU per square kilometre 31,879 constant LCU per square kilometre Tunisia
2020s 90,362 constant LCU per square kilometre 102,972 constant LCU per square kilometre 12,610 constant LCU per square kilometre Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Brazil or Tunisia?
Tunisia, at 106,623 constant LCU per square kilometre against 91,429 constant LCU per square kilometre in Brazil as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Brazil and Tunisia?
15,194 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Tunisia?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Tunisia rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Brazil ranks 141st and Tunisia ranks 139th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Tunisia: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/brazil/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/brazil/tunisia/">Brazil vs Tunisia: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 6,527 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.