Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Argentina
Argentina: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre was 54,978 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Latest (2023)
54,978 constant LCU per square kilometre
Change on year
down 2.0%
World rank
152nd
of 165 countries
All-time high
56,120 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2011
All-time low
12,199 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 1963
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Argentina, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in constant LCU per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Argentina is 54,978 constant LCU per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 2.0% on the previous year and up 3.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Argentina peaked at 56,120 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2011 and was at its lowest, 12,199 constant LCU per square kilometre, in 1963.
That places Argentina 152nd out of 165 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Argentina, year by year
| Year | constant LCU per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 15,333 constant LCU per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 14,102 constant LCU per square kilometre | -8.0% |
| 1963 | 12,199 constant LCU per square kilometre | -13.5% |
| 1964 | 13,431 constant LCU per square kilometre | +10.1% |
| 1965 | 14,102 constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.0% |
| 1966 | 14,102 constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 14,774 constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 1968 | 16,676 constant LCU per square kilometre | +12.9% |
| 1969 | 20,482 constant LCU per square kilometre | +22.8% |
| 1970 | 20,831 constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 1971 | 22,530 constant LCU per square kilometre | +8.2% |
| 1972 | 22,776 constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 1973 | 21,120 constant LCU per square kilometre | -7.3% |
| 1974 | 21,970 constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 1975 | 22,015 constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.2% |
| 1976 | 24,320 constant LCU per square kilometre | +10.5% |
| 1977 | 29,390 constant LCU per square kilometre | +20.8% |
| 1978 | 25,630 constant LCU per square kilometre | -12.8% |
| 1979 | 27,365 constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.8% |
| 1980 | 29,644 constant LCU per square kilometre | +8.3% |
| 1981 | 25,204 constant LCU per square kilometre | -15.0% |
| 1982 | 20,178 constant LCU per square kilometre | -19.9% |
| 1983 | 20,258 constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.4% |
| 1984 | 19,421 constant LCU per square kilometre | -4.1% |
| 1985 | 16,682 constant LCU per square kilometre | -14.1% |
| 1986 | 18,523 constant LCU per square kilometre | +11.0% |
| 1987 | 20,920 constant LCU per square kilometre | +12.9% |
| 1988 | 20,183 constant LCU per square kilometre | -3.5% |
| 1989 | 15,823 constant LCU per square kilometre | -21.6% |
| 1990 | 13,157 constant LCU per square kilometre | -16.9% |
| 1991 | 17,097 constant LCU per square kilometre | +29.9% |
| 1992 | 22,678 constant LCU per square kilometre | +32.6% |
| 1993 | 25,767 constant LCU per square kilometre | +13.6% |
| 1994 | 29,290 constant LCU per square kilometre | +13.7% |
| 1995 | 25,458 constant LCU per square kilometre | -13.1% |
| 1996 | 27,719 constant LCU per square kilometre | +8.9% |
| 1997 | 32,615 constant LCU per square kilometre | +17.7% |
| 1998 | 34,749 constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.5% |
| 1999 | 30,367 constant LCU per square kilometre | -12.6% |
| 2000 | 28,301 constant LCU per square kilometre | -6.8% |
| 2001 | 23,869 constant LCU per square kilometre | -15.7% |
| 2002 | 15,169 constant LCU per square kilometre | -36.4% |
| 2003 | 20,959 constant LCU per square kilometre | +38.2% |
| 2004 | 28,174 constant LCU per square kilometre | +34.4% |
| 2005 | 32,633 constant LCU per square kilometre | +15.8% |
| 2006 | 37,356 constant LCU per square kilometre | +14.5% |
| 2007 | 44,997 constant LCU per square kilometre | +20.5% |
| 2008 | 48,909 constant LCU per square kilometre | +8.7% |
| 2009 | 37,869 constant LCU per square kilometre | -22.6% |
| 2010 | 47,812 constant LCU per square kilometre | +26.3% |
| 2011 | 56,120 constant LCU per square kilometre | +17.4% |
| 2012 | 52,150 constant LCU per square kilometre | -7.1% |
| 2013 | 53,370 constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 2014 | 49,764 constant LCU per square kilometre | -6.8% |
| 2015 | 51,487 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 2016 | 48,512 constant LCU per square kilometre | -5.8% |
| 2017 | 55,004 constant LCU per square kilometre | +13.4% |
| 2018 | 51,843 constant LCU per square kilometre | -5.7% |
| 2019 | 43,573 constant LCU per square kilometre | -16.0% |
| 2020 | 37,880 constant LCU per square kilometre | -13.1% |
| 2021 | 50,766 constant LCU per square kilometre | +34.0% |
| 2022 | 56,072 constant LCU per square kilometre | +10.5% |
| 2023 | 54,978 constant LCU per square kilometre | -2.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 15,022 constant LCU per square kilometre | 12,199 constant LCU per square kilometre | 20,482 constant LCU per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 23,795 constant LCU per square kilometre | 20,831 constant LCU per square kilometre | 29,390 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 20,684 constant LCU per square kilometre | 15,823 constant LCU per square kilometre | 29,644 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 25,890 constant LCU per square kilometre | 13,157 constant LCU per square kilometre | 34,749 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 31,824 constant LCU per square kilometre | 15,169 constant LCU per square kilometre | 48,909 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 50,964 constant LCU per square kilometre | 43,573 constant LCU per square kilometre | 56,120 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 49,924 constant LCU per square kilometre | 37,880 constant LCU per square kilometre | 56,072 constant LCU per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Argentina
- 149 Mauritania 74,035 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 150 Canada 63,102 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 151 Bolivia 56,694 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 153 Namibia 53,208 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 154 Belize 47,648 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 155 Eritrea 33,106 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
More economy & growth data for Argentina
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 1.73 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 2.3 Percent per annum (2029)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), gaps 2.83 billion BoP, current US$ (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.0041 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 61.81 BoP, current US$ per person (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled 3.13 billion BoP, current US$ (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), annual -73.08 % change on previous year (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.0046 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 68.36 BoP, current US$ per person (2025)
- Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), annual growth rate 38.7 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Argentina?
- Gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Argentina was 54,978 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Argentina?
- The highest recorded value was 56,120 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2011.
- What is the lowest gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Argentina?
- The lowest recorded value was 12,199 constant LCU per square kilometre in 1963.
- How does Argentina rank for gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
- Argentina ranks 152nd out of 165 countries with data for 2023.
- Is gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre rising or falling in Argentina?
- Over the last ten years it is up 3.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Argentina data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Gross fixed capital formation Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.