Argentina vs Namibia: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Argentina
54,978 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
53,208 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Argentina rank
152nd
Namibia rank
153rd
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time
- Argentina
- Namibia
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 54,978 constant LCU per square kilometre against 53,208 constant LCU per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 1,770 constant LCU per square kilometre.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 152nd and Namibia ranks 153rd of 165 countries.
Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 20,684 constant LCU per square kilometre | 6,334 constant LCU per square kilometre | 14,350 constant LCU per square kilometre | Argentina |
| 1990s | 25,890 constant LCU per square kilometre | 9,608 constant LCU per square kilometre | 16,281 constant LCU per square kilometre | Argentina |
| 2000s | 31,824 constant LCU per square kilometre | 20,353 constant LCU per square kilometre | 11,471 constant LCU per square kilometre | Argentina |
| 2010s | 50,964 constant LCU per square kilometre | 40,168 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10,795 constant LCU per square kilometre | Argentina |
| 2020s | 49,924 constant LCU per square kilometre | 34,162 constant LCU per square kilometre | 15,762 constant LCU per square kilometre | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Argentina or Namibia?
- Argentina, at 54,978 constant LCU per square kilometre against 53,208 constant LCU per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Argentina and Namibia?
- 1,770 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Namibia?
- 44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
- How do Argentina and Namibia rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
- Argentina ranks 152nd and Namibia ranks 153rd of 165 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.