Argentina vs Eritrea: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Argentina
54,978 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Eritrea
33,106 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2011
Argentina rank
152nd
Eritrea rank
155th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Argentina
  • Eritrea
020.0k40.0k60.0k196119922023

How they compare

Argentina currently reports 54,978 constant LCU per square kilometre against 33,106 constant LCU per square kilometre in Eritrea, a difference of 21,872 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Argentina's figure about 1.7 times Eritrea's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Argentina ahead.

Argentina ranks 152nd and Eritrea ranks 155th of 165 countries.

Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Eritrea Difference Ahead
1990s 29,424 constant LCU per square kilometre 12,576 constant LCU per square kilometre 16,848 constant LCU per square kilometre Argentina
2000s 31,824 constant LCU per square kilometre 13,529 constant LCU per square kilometre 18,294 constant LCU per square kilometre Argentina
2010s 51,966 constant LCU per square kilometre 19,474 constant LCU per square kilometre 32,492 constant LCU per square kilometre Argentina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Argentina or Eritrea?
Argentina, at 54,978 constant LCU per square kilometre against 33,106 constant LCU per square kilometre in Eritrea as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Argentina and Eritrea?
21,872 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Eritrea?
19 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2011.
How do Argentina and Eritrea rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Argentina ranks 152nd and Eritrea ranks 155th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Eritrea: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/argentina/eritrea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/argentina/eritrea/">Argentina vs Eritrea: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 6,527 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.