Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre in Colombia
Colombia: Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre was 169.70 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre in Colombia, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current LCU per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre in Colombia is 169.70 million current LCU per square kilometre, measured in 2023. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
That represents a change of up 4.2% on the previous year and up 29.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre in Colombia peaked at 169.70 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 5,246 current LCU per square kilometre, in 1961.
Colombia ranks 16th of 184 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre in Colombia, year by year
| Year | current LCU per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 5,246 current LCU per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 5,583 current LCU per square kilometre | +6.4% |
| 1963 | 6,818 current LCU per square kilometre | +22.1% |
| 1964 | 8,059 current LCU per square kilometre | +18.2% |
| 1965 | 9,350 current LCU per square kilometre | +16.0% |
| 1966 | 9,705 current LCU per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 1967 | 13,610 current LCU per square kilometre | +40.2% |
| 1968 | 15,799 current LCU per square kilometre | +16.1% |
| 1969 | 17,530 current LCU per square kilometre | +11.0% |
| 1970 | 22,674 current LCU per square kilometre | +29.3% |
| 1971 | 21,588 current LCU per square kilometre | -4.8% |
| 1972 | 31,759 current LCU per square kilometre | +47.1% |
| 1973 | 44,994 current LCU per square kilometre | +41.7% |
| 1974 | 59,175 current LCU per square kilometre | +31.5% |
| 1975 | 68,637 current LCU per square kilometre | +16.0% |
| 1976 | 99,373 current LCU per square kilometre | +44.8% |
| 1977 | 144,683 current LCU per square kilometre | +45.6% |
| 1978 | 173,058 current LCU per square kilometre | +19.6% |
| 1979 | 213,466 current LCU per square kilometre | +23.3% |
| 1980 | 280,237 current LCU per square kilometre | +31.3% |
| 1981 | 304,825 current LCU per square kilometre | +8.8% |
| 1982 | 364,838 current LCU per square kilometre | +19.7% |
| 1983 | 471,056 current LCU per square kilometre | +29.1% |
| 1984 | 639,084 current LCU per square kilometre | +35.7% |
| 1985 | 909,626 current LCU per square kilometre | +42.3% |
| 1986 | 1.52 million current LCU per square kilometre | +67.1% |
| 1987 | 1.91 million current LCU per square kilometre | +25.7% |
| 1988 | 2.58 million current LCU per square kilometre | +35.1% |
| 1989 | 3.29 million current LCU per square kilometre | +27.6% |
| 1990 | 5.10 million current LCU per square kilometre | +54.9% |
| 1991 | 6.67 million current LCU per square kilometre | +30.7% |
| 1992 | 7.15 million current LCU per square kilometre | +7.3% |
| 1993 | 9.01 million current LCU per square kilometre | +26.0% |
| 1994 | 11.94 million current LCU per square kilometre | +32.5% |
| 1995 | 14.74 million current LCU per square kilometre | +23.4% |
| 1996 | 14.98 million current LCU per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1997 | 16.47 million current LCU per square kilometre | +9.9% |
| 1998 | 17.52 million current LCU per square kilometre | +6.4% |
| 1999 | 18.34 million current LCU per square kilometre | +4.7% |
| 2000 | 26.42 million current LCU per square kilometre | +44.1% |
| 2001 | 26.27 million current LCU per square kilometre | -0.6% |
| 2002 | 30.73 million current LCU per square kilometre | +17.0% |
| 2003 | 37.60 million current LCU per square kilometre | +22.3% |
| 2004 | 47.49 million current LCU per square kilometre | +26.3% |
| 2005 | 55.36 million current LCU per square kilometre | +16.6% |
| 2006 | 64.51 million current LCU per square kilometre | +16.5% |
| 2007 | 74.24 million current LCU per square kilometre | +15.1% |
| 2008 | 89.22 million current LCU per square kilometre | +20.2% |
| 2009 | 88.97 million current LCU per square kilometre | -0.3% |
| 2010 | 99.57 million current LCU per square kilometre | +11.9% |
| 2011 | 123.18 million current LCU per square kilometre | +23.7% |
| 2012 | 125.50 million current LCU per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 2013 | 131.10 million current LCU per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 2014 | 136.05 million current LCU per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 2015 | 121.22 million current LCU per square kilometre | -10.9% |
| 2016 | 127.67 million current LCU per square kilometre | +5.3% |
| 2017 | 137.78 million current LCU per square kilometre | +7.9% |
| 2018 | 146.54 million current LCU per square kilometre | +6.4% |
| 2019 | 148.65 million current LCU per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 2020 | 109.05 million current LCU per square kilometre | -26.6% |
| 2021 | 120.95 million current LCU per square kilometre | +10.9% |
| 2022 | 162.84 million current LCU per square kilometre | +34.6% |
| 2023 | 169.70 million current LCU per square kilometre | +4.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 10,189 current LCU per square kilometre | 5,246 current LCU per square kilometre | 17,530 current LCU per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 87,941 current LCU per square kilometre | 21,588 current LCU per square kilometre | 213,466 current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 1.23 million current LCU per square kilometre | 280,237 current LCU per square kilometre | 3.29 million current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 12.19 million current LCU per square kilometre | 5.10 million current LCU per square kilometre | 18.34 million current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 54.08 million current LCU per square kilometre | 26.27 million current LCU per square kilometre | 89.22 million current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 129.73 million current LCU per square kilometre | 99.57 million current LCU per square kilometre | 148.65 million current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 140.63 million current LCU per square kilometre | 109.05 million current LCU per square kilometre | 169.70 million current LCU per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Colombia
- 13 Costa Rica 192.09 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 14 Paraguay 176.33 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 15 Uganda 171.79 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 17 Rwanda 131.40 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 18 Guinea 123.10 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 19 Lao People's Democratic Republic 113.90 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
More economy & growth data for Colombia
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 2.41 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 3 Percent per annum (2029)
- Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), annual growth rate 8.42 % change on previous year (2025)
- Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP 0.1998 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per capita 1,711 constant 2015 US$ per person (2025)
- External balance on goods and services (current US$), annual growth -41.32 % change on previous year (2025)
- External balance on goods and services (current LCU), annual growth -40.58 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), annual 13.34 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per 403.12 current LCU per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per 3.45 million current LCU per person (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre in Colombia?
- Gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre in Colombia was 169.70 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Colombia?
- The highest recorded value was 169.70 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Colombia?
- The lowest recorded value was 5,246 current LCU per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Colombia rank for gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre?
- Colombia ranks 16th out of 184 countries with data for 2023.
- Is gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre rising or falling in Colombia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 29.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Colombia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Gross domestic savings (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Gross domestic savings (current LCU) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Gross domestic savings Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Gross domestic savings (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.