Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre in Rwanda
Rwanda: Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre was 131.40 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre in Rwanda, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current LCU per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre in Rwanda is 131.40 million current LCU per square kilometre, measured in 2023. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 12.2% on the previous year and up 636.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre in Rwanda peaked at 131.40 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, -1.45 million current LCU per square kilometre, in 1994.
Rwanda ranks 17th of 184 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre in Rwanda, year by year
| Year | current LCU per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 61,385 current LCU per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 55,184 current LCU per square kilometre | -10.1% |
| 1963 | 49,315 current LCU per square kilometre | -10.6% |
| 1964 | 64,322 current LCU per square kilometre | +30.4% |
| 1965 | 66,909 current LCU per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 1966 | 83,422 current LCU per square kilometre | +24.7% |
| 1967 | 129,902 current LCU per square kilometre | +55.7% |
| 1968 | 136,660 current LCU per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 1969 | 138,220 current LCU per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 1970 | 185,691 current LCU per square kilometre | +34.3% |
| 1971 | 181,478 current LCU per square kilometre | -2.3% |
| 1972 | 178,623 current LCU per square kilometre | -1.6% |
| 1973 | 240,562 current LCU per square kilometre | +34.7% |
| 1974 | 222,863 current LCU per square kilometre | -7.4% |
| 1975 | 478,739 current LCU per square kilometre | +114.8% |
| 1976 | 639,161 current LCU per square kilometre | +33.5% |
| 1977 | 803,429 current LCU per square kilometre | +25.7% |
| 1978 | 799,238 current LCU per square kilometre | -0.5% |
| 1979 | 1.04 million current LCU per square kilometre | +29.6% |
| 1980 | 943,271 current LCU per square kilometre | -8.9% |
| 1981 | 956,238 current LCU per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 1982 | 1.19 million current LCU per square kilometre | +24.1% |
| 1983 | 1.25 million current LCU per square kilometre | +5.3% |
| 1984 | 1.63 million current LCU per square kilometre | +30.6% |
| 1985 | 1.75 million current LCU per square kilometre | +7.2% |
| 1986 | 1.72 million current LCU per square kilometre | -1.6% |
| 1987 | 1.48 million current LCU per square kilometre | -13.7% |
| 1988 | 1.56 million current LCU per square kilometre | +4.9% |
| 1989 | 1.56 million current LCU per square kilometre | +0.2% |
| 1990 | 2.01 million current LCU per square kilometre | +28.5% |
| 1991 | 2.02 million current LCU per square kilometre | +0.6% |
| 1992 | 2.26 million current LCU per square kilometre | +12.0% |
| 1993 | 2.22 million current LCU per square kilometre | -1.7% |
| 1994 | -1.45 million current LCU per square kilometre | -165.4% |
| 1995 | 1.67 million current LCU per square kilometre | -215.2% |
| 1996 | 2.30 million current LCU per square kilometre | +37.4% |
| 1997 | 3.35 million current LCU per square kilometre | +45.6% |
| 1998 | 3.98 million current LCU per square kilometre | +19.0% |
| 1999 | 4.20 million current LCU per square kilometre | +5.6% |
| 2000 | 4.22 million current LCU per square kilometre | +0.4% |
| 2001 | 5.95 million current LCU per square kilometre | +40.8% |
| 2002 | 5.79 million current LCU per square kilometre | -2.6% |
| 2003 | 8.06 million current LCU per square kilometre | +39.2% |
| 2004 | 13.25 million current LCU per square kilometre | +64.4% |
| 2005 | 16.49 million current LCU per square kilometre | +24.4% |
| 2006 | 2.80 million current LCU per square kilometre | -83.0% |
| 2007 | 7.38 million current LCU per square kilometre | +163.8% |
| 2008 | 7.26 million current LCU per square kilometre | -1.6% |
| 2009 | 6.53 million current LCU per square kilometre | -10.1% |
| 2010 | 6.81 million current LCU per square kilometre | +4.3% |
| 2011 | 10.82 million current LCU per square kilometre | +58.9% |
| 2012 | 12.93 million current LCU per square kilometre | +19.5% |
| 2013 | 17.84 million current LCU per square kilometre | +37.9% |
| 2014 | 16.13 million current LCU per square kilometre | -9.5% |
| 2015 | 13.70 million current LCU per square kilometre | -15.1% |
| 2016 | 20.15 million current LCU per square kilometre | +47.0% |
| 2017 | 35.06 million current LCU per square kilometre | +74.0% |
| 2018 | 44.45 million current LCU per square kilometre | +26.8% |
| 2019 | 64.55 million current LCU per square kilometre | +45.2% |
| 2020 | 44.80 million current LCU per square kilometre | -30.6% |
| 2021 | 66.92 million current LCU per square kilometre | +49.4% |
| 2022 | 117.09 million current LCU per square kilometre | +75.0% |
| 2023 | 131.40 million current LCU per square kilometre | +12.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 87,258 current LCU per square kilometre | 49,315 current LCU per square kilometre | 138,220 current LCU per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 476,550 current LCU per square kilometre | 178,623 current LCU per square kilometre | 1.04 million current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 1.40 million current LCU per square kilometre | 943,271 current LCU per square kilometre | 1.75 million current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 2.26 million current LCU per square kilometre | -1.45 million current LCU per square kilometre | 4.20 million current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 7.77 million current LCU per square kilometre | 2.80 million current LCU per square kilometre | 16.49 million current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 24.24 million current LCU per square kilometre | 6.81 million current LCU per square kilometre | 64.55 million current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 90.05 million current LCU per square kilometre | 44.80 million current LCU per square kilometre | 131.40 million current LCU per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Rwanda
- 14 Paraguay 176.33 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 15 Uganda 171.79 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 16 Colombia 169.70 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 18 Guinea 123.10 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 19 Lao People's Democratic Republic 113.90 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 20 Maldives 108.67 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
More economy & growth data for Rwanda
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 5.1 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 7.3 Percent per annum (2029)
- Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), annual growth rate -8.96 % change on previous year (2025)
- Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP 0.2779 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per capita 312.33 constant 2015 US$ per person (2025)
- External balance on goods and services (current US$), annual growth 1 % change on previous year (2025)
- External balance on goods and services (current LCU), annual growth -7.29 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), annual 14.65 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per 290.03 current LCU per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per 325,923 current LCU per person (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre in Rwanda?
- Gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre in Rwanda was 131.40 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Rwanda?
- The highest recorded value was 131.40 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Rwanda?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.45 million current LCU per square kilometre in 1994.
- How does Rwanda rank for gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre?
- Rwanda ranks 17th out of 184 countries with data for 2023.
- Is gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre rising or falling in Rwanda?
- Over the last ten years it is up 636.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Rwanda data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Gross domestic savings (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Gross domestic savings (current LCU) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Gross domestic savings Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Gross domestic savings (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.