Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre in Costa Rica
Costa Rica: Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre was 192.09 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre in Costa Rica, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current LCU per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre in Costa Rica is 192.09 million current LCU per square kilometre, measured in 2023. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 4.1% on the previous year and up 130.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre in Costa Rica peaked at 192.09 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 6,831 current LCU per square kilometre, in 1965.
Costa Rica ranks 13th of 184 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre in Costa Rica, year by year
| Year | current LCU per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 8,423 current LCU per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 10,065 current LCU per square kilometre | +19.5% |
| 1963 | 9,170 current LCU per square kilometre | -8.9% |
| 1964 | 8,371 current LCU per square kilometre | -8.7% |
| 1965 | 6,831 current LCU per square kilometre | -18.4% |
| 1966 | 10,973 current LCU per square kilometre | +60.6% |
| 1967 | 11,816 current LCU per square kilometre | +7.7% |
| 1968 | 13,392 current LCU per square kilometre | +13.3% |
| 1969 | 16,252 current LCU per square kilometre | +21.4% |
| 1970 | 17,624 current LCU per square kilometre | +8.4% |
| 1971 | 19,604 current LCU per square kilometre | +11.2% |
| 1972 | 25,180 current LCU per square kilometre | +28.4% |
| 1973 | 35,666 current LCU per square kilometre | +41.6% |
| 1974 | 30,441 current LCU per square kilometre | -14.7% |
| 1975 | 43,296 current LCU per square kilometre | +42.2% |
| 1976 | 71,512 current LCU per square kilometre | +65.2% |
| 1977 | 96,968 current LCU per square kilometre | +35.6% |
| 1978 | 92,315 current LCU per square kilometre | -4.8% |
| 1979 | 101,894 current LCU per square kilometre | +10.4% |
| 1980 | 131,641 current LCU per square kilometre | +29.2% |
| 1981 | 269,732 current LCU per square kilometre | +104.9% |
| 1982 | 527,152 current LCU per square kilometre | +95.4% |
| 1983 | 593,541 current LCU per square kilometre | +12.6% |
| 1984 | 737,793 current LCU per square kilometre | +24.3% |
| 1985 | 935,574 current LCU per square kilometre | +26.8% |
| 1986 | 1.26 million current LCU per square kilometre | +34.5% |
| 1987 | 1.28 million current LCU per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 1988 | 1.55 million current LCU per square kilometre | +21.3% |
| 1989 | 1.89 million current LCU per square kilometre | +21.9% |
| 1990 | 2.09 million current LCU per square kilometre | +10.4% |
| 1991 | 2.38 million current LCU per square kilometre | +13.7% |
| 1992 | 3.36 million current LCU per square kilometre | +41.4% |
| 1993 | 3.67 million current LCU per square kilometre | +9.1% |
| 1994 | 4.69 million current LCU per square kilometre | +27.9% |
| 1995 | 6.53 million current LCU per square kilometre | +39.2% |
| 1996 | 6.52 million current LCU per square kilometre | -0.2% |
| 1997 | 9.00 million current LCU per square kilometre | +38.1% |
| 1998 | 12.79 million current LCU per square kilometre | +42.1% |
| 1999 | 14.88 million current LCU per square kilometre | +16.4% |
| 2000 | 18.14 million current LCU per square kilometre | +21.9% |
| 2001 | 20.87 million current LCU per square kilometre | +15.0% |
| 2002 | 20.94 million current LCU per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 2003 | 22.90 million current LCU per square kilometre | +9.4% |
| 2004 | 28.87 million current LCU per square kilometre | +26.1% |
| 2005 | 31.27 million current LCU per square kilometre | +8.3% |
| 2006 | 40.71 million current LCU per square kilometre | +30.2% |
| 2007 | 48.95 million current LCU per square kilometre | +20.2% |
| 2008 | 50.23 million current LCU per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 2009 | 61.99 million current LCU per square kilometre | +23.4% |
| 2010 | 69.73 million current LCU per square kilometre | +12.5% |
| 2011 | 69.26 million current LCU per square kilometre | -0.7% |
| 2012 | 74.94 million current LCU per square kilometre | +8.2% |
| 2013 | 83.32 million current LCU per square kilometre | +11.2% |
| 2014 | 91.90 million current LCU per square kilometre | +10.3% |
| 2015 | 106.91 million current LCU per square kilometre | +16.3% |
| 2016 | 120.73 million current LCU per square kilometre | +12.9% |
| 2017 | 124.56 million current LCU per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 2018 | 132.10 million current LCU per square kilometre | +6.1% |
| 2019 | 138.28 million current LCU per square kilometre | +4.7% |
| 2020 | 137.99 million current LCU per square kilometre | -0.2% |
| 2021 | 154.07 million current LCU per square kilometre | +11.7% |
| 2022 | 184.52 million current LCU per square kilometre | +19.8% |
| 2023 | 192.09 million current LCU per square kilometre | +4.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 10,588 current LCU per square kilometre | 6,831 current LCU per square kilometre | 16,252 current LCU per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 53,450 current LCU per square kilometre | 17,624 current LCU per square kilometre | 101,894 current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 918,208 current LCU per square kilometre | 131,641 current LCU per square kilometre | 1.89 million current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 6.59 million current LCU per square kilometre | 2.09 million current LCU per square kilometre | 14.88 million current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 34.49 million current LCU per square kilometre | 18.14 million current LCU per square kilometre | 61.99 million current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 101.17 million current LCU per square kilometre | 69.26 million current LCU per square kilometre | 138.28 million current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 167.17 million current LCU per square kilometre | 137.99 million current LCU per square kilometre | 192.09 million current LCU per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Costa Rica
- 10 Cambodia 331.21 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 11 Iraq 329.46 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 12 Hungary 250.13 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 14 Paraguay 176.33 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 15 Uganda 171.79 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 16 Colombia 169.70 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
More economy & growth data for Costa Rica
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 2.74 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 3.3 Percent per annum (2029)
- Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), annual growth rate 6.47 % change on previous year (2025)
- Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP 0.267 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per capita 5,332 constant 2015 US$ per person (2025)
- External balance on goods and services (current US$), annual growth 26.87 % change on previous year (2025)
- External balance on goods and services (current LCU), annual growth 24.01 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), annual 2.2 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per 16.95 current LCU per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per 338,428 current LCU per person (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre in Costa Rica?
- Gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre in Costa Rica was 192.09 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Costa Rica?
- The highest recorded value was 192.09 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Costa Rica?
- The lowest recorded value was 6,831 current LCU per square kilometre in 1965.
- How does Costa Rica rank for gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre?
- Costa Rica ranks 13th out of 184 countries with data for 2023.
- Is gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre rising or falling in Costa Rica?
- Over the last ten years it is up 130.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Costa Rica data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Gross domestic savings (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Gross domestic savings (current LCU) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Gross domestic savings Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Gross domestic savings (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.