Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Argentina
Argentina: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre was 55,886 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Argentina, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in constant LCU per square kilometre.
Analysis
Argentina recorded 55,886 constant LCU per square kilometre for gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 1.6% on the previous year and up 3.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Argentina peaked at 57,998 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2011 and was at its lowest, 12,606 constant LCU per square kilometre, in 1963.
Argentina ranks 152nd of 166 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.
Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Argentina, year by year
| Year | constant LCU per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 16,809 constant LCU per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 15,326 constant LCU per square kilometre | -8.8% |
| 1963 | 12,606 constant LCU per square kilometre | -17.7% |
| 1964 | 16,191 constant LCU per square kilometre | +28.4% |
| 1965 | 16,809 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 1966 | 16,191 constant LCU per square kilometre | -3.7% |
| 1967 | 16,809 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 1968 | 18,292 constant LCU per square kilometre | +8.8% |
| 1969 | 22,494 constant LCU per square kilometre | +23.0% |
| 1970 | 22,996 constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1971 | 25,510 constant LCU per square kilometre | +10.9% |
| 1972 | 25,769 constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 1973 | 24,558 constant LCU per square kilometre | -4.7% |
| 1974 | 24,830 constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 1975 | 25,275 constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 1976 | 27,030 constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.9% |
| 1977 | 32,678 constant LCU per square kilometre | +20.9% |
| 1978 | 27,475 constant LCU per square kilometre | -15.9% |
| 1979 | 30,280 constant LCU per square kilometre | +10.2% |
| 1980 | 32,735 constant LCU per square kilometre | +8.1% |
| 1981 | 27,833 constant LCU per square kilometre | -15.0% |
| 1982 | 22,282 constant LCU per square kilometre | -19.9% |
| 1983 | 22,371 constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.4% |
| 1984 | 21,446 constant LCU per square kilometre | -4.1% |
| 1985 | 18,421 constant LCU per square kilometre | -14.1% |
| 1986 | 20,455 constant LCU per square kilometre | +11.0% |
| 1987 | 23,101 constant LCU per square kilometre | +12.9% |
| 1988 | 22,288 constant LCU per square kilometre | -3.5% |
| 1989 | 17,474 constant LCU per square kilometre | -21.6% |
| 1990 | 14,529 constant LCU per square kilometre | -16.9% |
| 1991 | 18,880 constant LCU per square kilometre | +29.9% |
| 1992 | 25,042 constant LCU per square kilometre | +32.6% |
| 1993 | 28,640 constant LCU per square kilometre | +14.4% |
| 1994 | 32,258 constant LCU per square kilometre | +12.6% |
| 1995 | 28,182 constant LCU per square kilometre | -12.6% |
| 1996 | 31,875 constant LCU per square kilometre | +13.1% |
| 1997 | 37,164 constant LCU per square kilometre | +16.6% |
| 1998 | 38,985 constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.9% |
| 1999 | 32,388 constant LCU per square kilometre | -16.9% |
| 2000 | 31,155 constant LCU per square kilometre | -3.8% |
| 2001 | 27,437 constant LCU per square kilometre | -11.9% |
| 2002 | 17,122 constant LCU per square kilometre | -37.6% |
| 2003 | 24,004 constant LCU per square kilometre | +40.2% |
| 2004 | 31,112 constant LCU per square kilometre | +29.6% |
| 2005 | 35,715 constant LCU per square kilometre | +14.8% |
| 2006 | 38,168 constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.9% |
| 2007 | 45,927 constant LCU per square kilometre | +20.3% |
| 2008 | 48,997 constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.7% |
| 2009 | 37,693 constant LCU per square kilometre | -23.1% |
| 2010 | 49,958 constant LCU per square kilometre | +32.5% |
| 2011 | 57,998 constant LCU per square kilometre | +16.1% |
| 2012 | 51,511 constant LCU per square kilometre | -11.2% |
| 2013 | 53,916 constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.7% |
| 2014 | 50,561 constant LCU per square kilometre | -6.2% |
| 2015 | 52,865 constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.6% |
| 2016 | 50,177 constant LCU per square kilometre | -5.1% |
| 2017 | 57,931 constant LCU per square kilometre | +15.5% |
| 2018 | 52,226 constant LCU per square kilometre | -9.8% |
| 2019 | 41,796 constant LCU per square kilometre | -20.0% |
| 2020 | 39,117 constant LCU per square kilometre | -6.4% |
| 2021 | 50,907 constant LCU per square kilometre | +30.1% |
| 2022 | 56,812 constant LCU per square kilometre | +11.6% |
| 2023 | 55,886 constant LCU per square kilometre | -1.6% |
Argentina compared with similar countries
- Argentina's 55,886 constant LCU per square kilometre is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 1.62 million constant LCU per square kilometre, 3% of the median. (46 countries reporting)
- Argentina's 55,886 constant LCU per square kilometre is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 412,013 constant LCU per square kilometre, 14% of the median. (23 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 16,836 constant LCU per square kilometre | 12,606 constant LCU per square kilometre | 22,494 constant LCU per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 26,640 constant LCU per square kilometre | 22,996 constant LCU per square kilometre | 32,678 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 22,841 constant LCU per square kilometre | 17,474 constant LCU per square kilometre | 32,735 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 28,794 constant LCU per square kilometre | 14,529 constant LCU per square kilometre | 38,985 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 33,733 constant LCU per square kilometre | 17,122 constant LCU per square kilometre | 48,997 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 51,894 constant LCU per square kilometre | 41,796 constant LCU per square kilometre | 57,998 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 50,680 constant LCU per square kilometre | 39,117 constant LCU per square kilometre | 56,812 constant LCU per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Argentina
- 149 Canada 65,009 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 150 Bolivia 59,912 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 151 Namibia 56,107 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 153 Belize 44,624 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 154 Eritrea 33,106 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 155 Oman 30,746 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
More economy & growth data for Argentina
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 1.73 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 2.3 Percent per annum (2029)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), gaps 2.83 billion BoP, current US$ (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.0041 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 61.81 BoP, current US$ per person (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled 3.13 billion BoP, current US$ (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), annual -73.08 % change on previous year (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.0046 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 68.36 BoP, current US$ per person (2025)
- Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), annual growth rate 38.7 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Argentina?
- Gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Argentina was 55,886 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Argentina?
- The highest recorded value was 57,998 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2011.
- What is the lowest gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Argentina?
- The lowest recorded value was 12,606 constant LCU per square kilometre in 1963.
- How does Argentina rank for gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
- Argentina ranks 152nd out of 166 countries with data for 2023.
- Is gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre rising or falling in Argentina?
- Over the last ten years it is up 3.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Argentina data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Gross capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Gross capital formation (constant LCU) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Gross capital formation Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Gross capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.