Argentina vs Namibia: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Argentina
55,886 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
56,107 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Argentina rank
152nd
Namibia rank
151st

Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Argentina
  • Namibia
020.0k40.0k60.0k196119922023

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 56,107 constant LCU per square kilometre against 55,886 constant LCU per square kilometre in Argentina, a difference of 221 constant LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Argentina ahead.

Argentina ranks 152nd and Namibia ranks 151st of 166 countries.

Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Namibia Difference Ahead
1980s 22,841 constant LCU per square kilometre 6,300 constant LCU per square kilometre 16,540 constant LCU per square kilometre Argentina
1990s 28,794 constant LCU per square kilometre 9,664 constant LCU per square kilometre 19,130 constant LCU per square kilometre Argentina
2000s 33,733 constant LCU per square kilometre 20,352 constant LCU per square kilometre 13,381 constant LCU per square kilometre Argentina
2010s 51,894 constant LCU per square kilometre 39,264 constant LCU per square kilometre 12,630 constant LCU per square kilometre Argentina
2020s 50,680 constant LCU per square kilometre 36,291 constant LCU per square kilometre 14,389 constant LCU per square kilometre Argentina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Argentina or Namibia?
Namibia, at 56,107 constant LCU per square kilometre against 55,886 constant LCU per square kilometre in Argentina as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Argentina and Namibia?
221 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Namibia?
44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do Argentina and Namibia rank globally for gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Argentina ranks 152nd and Namibia ranks 151st of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Namibia: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/argentina/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/argentina/namibia/">Argentina vs Namibia: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
166 places, 6,614 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.