Argentina vs Bolivia: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Argentina
55,886 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Bolivia
59,912 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Argentina rank
152nd
Bolivia rank
150th

Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Argentina
  • Bolivia
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k196119922023

How they compare

Bolivia currently reports 59,912 constant LCU per square kilometre against 55,886 constant LCU per square kilometre in Argentina, a difference of 4,026 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Bolivia's figure about 1.1 times Argentina's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Argentina ahead.

Argentina ranks 152nd and Bolivia ranks 150th of 166 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 5 and Bolivia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Bolivia Difference Ahead
1960s 16,836 constant LCU per square kilometre 7,220 constant LCU per square kilometre 9,616 constant LCU per square kilometre Argentina
1970s 26,640 constant LCU per square kilometre 14,099 constant LCU per square kilometre 12,541 constant LCU per square kilometre Argentina
1980s 22,841 constant LCU per square kilometre 11,275 constant LCU per square kilometre 11,565 constant LCU per square kilometre Argentina
1990s 28,794 constant LCU per square kilometre 20,052 constant LCU per square kilometre 8,742 constant LCU per square kilometre Argentina
2000s 33,733 constant LCU per square kilometre 24,898 constant LCU per square kilometre 8,835 constant LCU per square kilometre Argentina
2010s 51,894 constant LCU per square kilometre 56,611 constant LCU per square kilometre 4,717 constant LCU per square kilometre Bolivia
2020s 50,680 constant LCU per square kilometre 54,626 constant LCU per square kilometre 3,945 constant LCU per square kilometre Bolivia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Argentina or Bolivia?
Bolivia, at 59,912 constant LCU per square kilometre against 55,886 constant LCU per square kilometre in Argentina as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Argentina and Bolivia?
4,026 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Bolivia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Bolivia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Argentina and Bolivia rank globally for gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Argentina ranks 152nd and Bolivia ranks 150th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Bolivia: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/argentina/bolivia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/argentina/bolivia/">Argentina vs Bolivia: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
166 places, 6,614 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.