GDP (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Puerto Rico
Puerto Rico: GDP (constant LCU), per square kilometre was 11.31 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Latest (2023)
11.31 million constant LCU per square kilometre
Change on year
up 0.7%
World rank
92nd
of 211 countries
All-time high
13.68 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2004
All-time low
1.87 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023
GDP (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Puerto Rico, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in constant LCU per square kilometre.
Analysis
Puerto Rico recorded 11.31 million constant LCU per square kilometre for gdp (constant lcu), per square kilometre in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 0.7% on the previous year and down 9.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, gdp (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Puerto Rico peaked at 13.68 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 2004 and was at its lowest, 1.87 million constant LCU per square kilometre, in 1961.
That places Puerto Rico 92nd out of 211 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.
GDP (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Puerto Rico, year by year
| Year | constant LCU per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 1.87 million constant LCU per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 2.03 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +8.3% |
| 1963 | 2.20 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +8.7% |
| 1964 | 2.36 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.1% |
| 1965 | 2.58 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +9.2% |
| 1966 | 2.77 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.5% |
| 1967 | 2.94 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.2% |
| 1968 | 3.10 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 1969 | 3.39 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +9.4% |
| 1970 | 3.67 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +8.4% |
| 1971 | 3.90 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.4% |
| 1972 | 4.18 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.2% |
| 1973 | 4.45 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.3% |
| 1974 | 4.58 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1975 | 4.55 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -0.7% |
| 1976 | 4.83 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.2% |
| 1977 | 5.12 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.0% |
| 1978 | 5.48 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.9% |
| 1979 | 5.91 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.9% |
| 1980 | 6.16 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 1981 | 6.23 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 1982 | 6.13 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -1.6% |
| 1983 | 5.99 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -2.3% |
| 1984 | 6.34 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.9% |
| 1985 | 6.54 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1986 | 6.87 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.0% |
| 1987 | 7.26 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.8% |
| 1988 | 7.69 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.9% |
| 1989 | 8.02 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.3% |
| 1990 | 7.80 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -2.8% |
| 1991 | 7.98 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 1992 | 8.34 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.6% |
| 1993 | 8.73 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.6% |
| 1994 | 9.09 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 1995 | 9.51 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 1996 | 9.73 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 1997 | 10.20 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.9% |
| 1998 | 10.76 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.5% |
| 1999 | 11.34 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.4% |
| 2000 | 11.72 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 2001 | 12.46 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.3% |
| 2002 | 12.57 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 2003 | 12.58 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.1% |
| 2004 | 13.68 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +8.7% |
| 2005 | 13.40 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -2.0% |
| 2006 | 13.22 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -1.4% |
| 2007 | 13.06 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -1.2% |
| 2008 | 12.82 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -1.8% |
| 2009 | 12.57 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -2.0% |
| 2010 | 12.52 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -0.4% |
| 2011 | 12.47 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -0.4% |
| 2012 | 12.48 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 12.44 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -0.3% |
| 2014 | 12.29 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -1.2% |
| 2015 | 12.16 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -1.0% |
| 2016 | 12.01 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -1.3% |
| 2017 | 11.66 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -2.9% |
| 2018 | 11.15 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -4.4% |
| 2019 | 11.34 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 2020 | 10.87 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -4.2% |
| 2021 | 10.91 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.4% |
| 2022 | 11.23 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 2023 | 11.31 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.58 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 1.87 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 3.39 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 4.67 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 3.67 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 5.91 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 6.72 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 5.99 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 8.02 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 9.35 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 7.80 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 11.34 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 12.81 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 11.72 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 13.68 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 12.05 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 11.15 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 12.52 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 11.08 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 10.87 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 11.31 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Puerto Rico
- 89 Angola 12.49 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 90 Vanuatu 12.23 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 91 United States Virgin Islands 11.40 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 93 Norway 10.75 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 94 Uruguay 10.53 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 95 Antigua and Barbuda 10.40 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
More economy & growth data for Puerto Rico
- GDP (constant LCU), annual growth rate 0.3178 % change on previous year (2025)
- Gross domestic savings (current US$), per unit of GDP 0.1359 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- GNI (current LCU), per capita 27,496 current LCU per person (2025)
- Gross domestic savings (current US$), annual growth rate -5.45 % change on previous year (2025)
- GDP (constant LCU), per capita 32,612 constant LCU per person (2025)
- GDP (constant LCU), per unit of GDP 0.8029 constant LCU per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Net primary income (Net income from abroad) (current US$), annual -2.97 % change on previous year (2025)
- GDP (current LCU), per capita 40,620 current LCU per person (2025)
- GDP (constant 2015 US$), annual growth rate 0.3176 % change on previous year (2025)
- Gross domestic savings (current US$), per capita 5,519 current US$ per person (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is gdp (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Puerto Rico?
- Gdp (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Puerto Rico was 11.31 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest gdp (constant lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Puerto Rico?
- The highest recorded value was 13.68 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 2004.
- What is the lowest gdp (constant lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Puerto Rico?
- The lowest recorded value was 1.87 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Puerto Rico rank for gdp (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
- Puerto Rico ranks 92nd out of 211 countries with data for 2023.
- Is gdp (constant lcu), per square kilometre rising or falling in Puerto Rico?
- Over the last ten years it is down 9.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Puerto Rico data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of GDP (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
GDP (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
GDP (constant LCU) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
GDP (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.