Norway vs Puerto Rico: GDP (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Norway
10.75 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Puerto Rico
11.31 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Norway rank
93rd
Puerto Rico rank
92nd

GDP (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Norway
  • Puerto Rico
2.5M5.0M7.5M10.0M12.5M196119922023

How they compare

Puerto Rico currently reports 11.31 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 10.75 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Norway, a difference of 565,400 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Puerto Rico's figure about 1.1 times Norway's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Puerto Rico has been ahead every year.

Norway ranks 93rd and Puerto Rico ranks 92nd of 211 countries.

Puerto Rico has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Norway Puerto Rico Difference Ahead
1960s 2.02 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.58 million constant LCU per square kilometre 564,609 constant LCU per square kilometre Puerto Rico
1970s 3.03 million constant LCU per square kilometre 4.67 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.64 million constant LCU per square kilometre Puerto Rico
1980s 4.37 million constant LCU per square kilometre 6.72 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.35 million constant LCU per square kilometre Puerto Rico
1990s 5.86 million constant LCU per square kilometre 9.35 million constant LCU per square kilometre 3.48 million constant LCU per square kilometre Puerto Rico
2000s 7.86 million constant LCU per square kilometre 12.81 million constant LCU per square kilometre 4.95 million constant LCU per square kilometre Puerto Rico
2010s 9.26 million constant LCU per square kilometre 12.05 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.79 million constant LCU per square kilometre Puerto Rico
2020s 10.41 million constant LCU per square kilometre 11.08 million constant LCU per square kilometre 672,760 constant LCU per square kilometre Puerto Rico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Norway or Puerto Rico?
Puerto Rico, at 11.31 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 10.75 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Norway as of 2023.
What is the difference in gdp (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Norway and Puerto Rico?
565,400 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Puerto Rico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Puerto Rico?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Norway and Puerto Rico rank globally for gdp (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Norway ranks 93rd and Puerto Rico ranks 92nd of 211 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GDP (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Norway vs Puerto Rico: GDP (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/norway/puerto-rico-us/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/norway/puerto-rico-us/">Norway vs Puerto Rico: GDP (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
212 places, 10,754 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

GDP (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.