GDP (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Italy
Italy: GDP (constant LCU), per square kilometre was 6.51 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Latest (2023)
6.51 million constant LCU per square kilometre
Change on year
up 0.9%
World rank
114th
of 211 countries
All-time high
6.51 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
All-time low
1.71 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023
GDP (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Italy, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in constant LCU per square kilometre.
Analysis
Italy recorded 6.51 million constant LCU per square kilometre for gdp (constant lcu), per square kilometre in 2023. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 0.9% on the previous year and up 10.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, gdp (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Italy peaked at 6.51 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 1.71 million constant LCU per square kilometre, in 1961.
Italy ranks 114th of 211 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.
GDP (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Italy, year by year
| Year | constant LCU per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 1.71 million constant LCU per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 1.82 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.2% |
| 1963 | 1.92 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.6% |
| 1964 | 1.98 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1965 | 2.04 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 1966 | 2.16 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.0% |
| 1967 | 2.32 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.2% |
| 1968 | 2.47 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.5% |
| 1969 | 2.62 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.1% |
| 1970 | 2.76 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.3% |
| 1971 | 2.81 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 1972 | 2.91 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 1973 | 3.12 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.1% |
| 1974 | 3.29 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.5% |
| 1975 | 3.22 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -2.1% |
| 1976 | 3.45 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.1% |
| 1977 | 3.54 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 1978 | 3.66 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 1979 | 3.87 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.0% |
| 1980 | 4.01 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 1981 | 4.04 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.8% |
| 1982 | 4.06 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.4% |
| 1983 | 4.10 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 1984 | 4.24 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 1985 | 4.36 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1986 | 4.48 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1987 | 4.62 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 1988 | 4.82 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 1989 | 4.98 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 1990 | 5.08 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1991 | 5.16 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1992 | 5.20 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.8% |
| 1993 | 5.16 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -0.9% |
| 1994 | 5.27 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1995 | 5.42 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1996 | 5.49 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 1997 | 5.60 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 1998 | 5.70 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 1999 | 5.79 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 2000 | 5.99 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 2001 | 6.11 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 2002 | 6.12 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 2003 | 6.13 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.1% |
| 2004 | 6.22 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 2005 | 6.26 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.8% |
| 2006 | 6.38 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 2007 | 6.47 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 2008 | 6.40 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -1.0% |
| 2009 | 6.06 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -5.3% |
| 2010 | 6.16 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 2011 | 6.20 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.7% |
| 2012 | 6.01 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -3.1% |
| 2013 | 5.90 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -1.8% |
| 2014 | 5.90 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -0.0% |
| 2015 | 5.95 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 2016 | 6.02 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 2017 | 6.12 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 2018 | 6.17 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.8% |
| 2019 | 6.20 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.4% |
| 2020 | 5.65 million constant LCU per square kilometre | -8.9% |
| 2021 | 6.15 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +8.9% |
| 2022 | 6.45 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 2023 | 6.51 million constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.12 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 1.71 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 2.62 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 3.26 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 2.76 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 3.87 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 4.37 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 4.01 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 4.98 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 5.39 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 5.08 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 5.79 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 6.21 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 5.99 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 6.47 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 6.06 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 5.90 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 6.20 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 6.19 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 5.65 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 6.51 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Italy
- 111 Niger 6.86 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 112 Ireland 6.75 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 113 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 6.54 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 115 Naoero 6.29 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 116 Andorra 6.15 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 117 Kazakhstan 6.04 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
More economy & growth data for Italy
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 1.18 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 0.8337 Percent per annum (2029)
- Services, value added (current US$), annual growth rate 6.79 % change on previous year (2025)
- Services, value added (current US$), per unit of GDP 0.6451 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Services, value added (current US$), per capita 27,940 current US$ per person (2025)
- Services, value added (current LCU), annual growth rate 2.29 % change on previous year (2025)
- Services, value added (current LCU), per unit of GDP 0.5709 current LCU per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Services, value added (current LCU), per capita 24,726 current LCU per person (2025)
- Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), annual growth rate 0.2898 % change on previous year (2025)
- Services, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP 0.5343 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is gdp (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Italy?
- Gdp (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Italy was 6.51 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest gdp (constant lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Italy?
- The highest recorded value was 6.51 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest gdp (constant lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Italy?
- The lowest recorded value was 1.71 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Italy rank for gdp (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
- Italy ranks 114th out of 211 countries with data for 2023.
- Is gdp (constant lcu), per square kilometre rising or falling in Italy?
- Over the last ten years it is up 10.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Italy data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of GDP (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
GDP (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
GDP (constant LCU) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
GDP (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.