GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre in Lower middle income
Lower middle income: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre was 331,715 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
331,715 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 5.3%
Rank
23rd
of 45 groups
All-time high
331,715 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
All-time low
24,210 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023
GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre in Lower middle income, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, gdp (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre in Lower middle income stood at 331,715 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 5.3% on the previous year and up 52.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, gdp (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre in Lower middle income peaked at 331,715 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 24,210 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, in 1961.
That places Lower middle income 23rd out of 45 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre in Lower middle income, year by year
| Year | constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 24,210 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 25,204 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 1963 | 26,689 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +5.9% |
| 1964 | 28,632 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +7.3% |
| 1965 | 29,197 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1966 | 29,513 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 1967 | 29,908 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 1968 | 31,125 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 1969 | 33,468 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +7.5% |
| 1970 | 36,023 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +7.6% |
| 1971 | 37,643 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 1972 | 38,163 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 1973 | 39,824 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 1974 | 41,735 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 1975 | 43,086 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 1976 | 45,396 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +5.4% |
| 1977 | 47,993 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +5.7% |
| 1978 | 49,626 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 1979 | 50,019 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +0.8% |
| 1980 | 52,208 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 1981 | 52,928 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 1982 | 53,990 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1983 | 54,739 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 1984 | 56,823 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 1985 | 59,554 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 1986 | 61,954 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 1987 | 64,231 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 1988 | 68,666 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +6.9% |
| 1989 | 70,292 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 1990 | 74,081 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +5.4% |
| 1991 | 76,032 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 1992 | 75,715 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | -0.4% |
| 1993 | 77,088 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 1994 | 79,750 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 1995 | 83,699 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +5.0% |
| 1996 | 88,777 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +6.1% |
| 1997 | 92,231 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 1998 | 96,538 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +4.7% |
| 1999 | 101,406 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +5.0% |
| 2000 | 105,406 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 2001 | 110,042 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 2002 | 114,325 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 2003 | 120,532 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +5.4% |
| 2004 | 129,612 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +7.5% |
| 2005 | 138,549 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +6.9% |
| 2006 | 148,501 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +7.2% |
| 2007 | 158,836 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +7.0% |
| 2008 | 166,045 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 2009 | 175,969 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +6.0% |
| 2010 | 187,517 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +6.6% |
| 2011 | 196,287 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +4.7% |
| 2012 | 206,186 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +5.0% |
| 2013 | 217,589 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +5.5% |
| 2014 | 230,198 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +5.8% |
| 2015 | 242,866 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +5.5% |
| 2016 | 254,993 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +5.0% |
| 2017 | 267,230 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 2018 | 280,308 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +4.9% |
| 2019 | 289,818 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 2020 | 277,560 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | -4.2% |
| 2021 | 296,431 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +6.8% |
| 2022 | 315,041 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +6.3% |
| 2023 | 331,715 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +5.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 28,661 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 24,210 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 33,468 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 42,951 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 36,023 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 50,019 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 59,538 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 52,208 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 70,292 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 84,532 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 74,081 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 101,406 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 136,782 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 105,406 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 175,969 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 237,299 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 187,517 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 289,818 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 305,187 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 277,560 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 331,715 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Lower middle income
- 20 Barbados 14.25 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre compare
- 21 United Kingdom 13.57 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre compare
- 22 Japan 12.95 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre compare
- 23 Isle of Man 12.45 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre compare
- 24 United States Virgin Islands 11.14 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre compare
- 25 Puerto Rico 10.84 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre compare
- 26 Guam 10.59 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre compare
More economy & growth data for Lower middle income
- Exports of goods and services 1.50 trillion constant 2015 US$ (2025)
- Final consumption expenditure 5.65 trillion constant 2015 US$ (2025)
- Final consumption expenditure 6.6% (2025)
- Gross national expenditure 8.19 trillion current US$ (2025)
- Gross national expenditure 7.64 trillion constant 2015 US$ (2025)
- Exports of goods and services 1.70 trillion current US$ (2025)
- Services, value added 6.8% (2025)
- Gross fixed capital formation 1.97 trillion constant 2015 US$ (2025)
- Gross fixed capital formation 2.11 trillion current US$ (2025)
- Final consumption expenditure 5.92 trillion current US$ (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is gdp (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre in Lower middle income?
- Gdp (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre in Lower middle income was 331,715 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest gdp (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre recorded in Lower middle income?
- The highest recorded value was 331,715 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest gdp (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre recorded in Lower middle income?
- The lowest recorded value was 24,210 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Lower middle income rank for gdp (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
- Lower middle income ranks 23rd out of 45 groups with data for 2023.
- Is gdp (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre rising or falling in Lower middle income?
- Over the last ten years it is up 52.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Lower middle income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
GDP (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
GDP (constant 2015 US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
GDP (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.