Isle of Man vs Lower middle income: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Isle of Man
12.45 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Lower middle income
331,715 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Isle of Man rank
23rd
Lower middle income rank
23rd

GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Isle of Man
  • Lower middle income
05.0M10.0M15.0M196119922023

How they compare

Isle of Man currently reports 12.45 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 331,715 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Lower middle income, a difference of 12.12 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Isle of Man's figure about 37.5 times Lower middle income's.

Across all 40 years both countries report, Isle of Man has been ahead every year.

Isle of Man ranks 23rd and Lower middle income ranks 23rd of 208 countries.

Isle of Man has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Isle of Man Lower middle income Difference Ahead
1980s 2.61 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 63,587 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2.55 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Isle of Man
1990s 4.11 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 84,532 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 4.02 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Isle of Man
2000s 8.06 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 136,782 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 7.93 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Isle of Man
2010s 12.41 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 237,299 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 12.18 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Isle of Man
2020s 12.80 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 305,187 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 12.49 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Isle of Man

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Isle of Man or Lower middle income?
Isle of Man, at 12.45 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 331,715 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Lower middle income as of 2023.
What is the difference in gdp (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Isle of Man and Lower middle income?
12.12 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Isle of Man ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Isle of Man and Lower middle income?
40 years are reported by both, from 1984 to 2023.
How do Isle of Man and Lower middle income rank globally for gdp (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Isle of Man ranks 23rd and Lower middle income ranks 23rd of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Isle of Man vs Lower middle income: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/isle-of-man/lower-middle-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/isle-of-man/lower-middle-income/">Isle of Man vs Lower middle income: GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
256 places, 13,494 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

GDP (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.