Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per in Guatemala

Guatemala: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per was 501,036 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising

Latest (2023)
501,036 constant LCU per square kilometre
Change on year
up 1.4%
World rank
78th
of 194 countries
All-time high
501,036 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
All-time low
74,859 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per in Guatemala, 1961–2023

100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k500.0k196119922023

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in constant LCU per square kilometre.

Analysis

The most recent figure for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per in Guatemala is 501,036 constant LCU per square kilometre, measured in 2023. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 1.4% on the previous year and up 24.5% over ten years.

Over the whole period, agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per in Guatemala peaked at 501,036 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 74,859 constant LCU per square kilometre, in 1961.

Guatemala ranks 78th of 194 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per in Guatemala, year by year

Annual values for Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Guatemala, 1961 to 2023.
Year constant LCU per square kilometre Change
1961 74,859 constant LCU per square kilometre
1962 77,473 constant LCU per square kilometre +3.5%
1963 88,716 constant LCU per square kilometre +14.5%
1964 89,017 constant LCU per square kilometre +0.3%
1965 90,081 constant LCU per square kilometre +1.2%
1966 94,314 constant LCU per square kilometre +4.7%
1967 94,406 constant LCU per square kilometre +0.1%
1968 104,609 constant LCU per square kilometre +10.8%
1969 107,084 constant LCU per square kilometre +2.4%
1970 113,284 constant LCU per square kilometre +5.8%
1971 121,288 constant LCU per square kilometre +7.1%
1972 132,947 constant LCU per square kilometre +9.6%
1973 139,979 constant LCU per square kilometre +5.3%
1974 148,932 constant LCU per square kilometre +6.4%
1975 152,657 constant LCU per square kilometre +2.5%
1976 159,527 constant LCU per square kilometre +4.5%
1977 165,749 constant LCU per square kilometre +3.9%
1978 170,978 constant LCU per square kilometre +3.2%
1979 175,836 constant LCU per square kilometre +2.8%
1980 178,589 constant LCU per square kilometre +1.6%
1981 180,763 constant LCU per square kilometre +1.2%
1982 175,327 constant LCU per square kilometre -3.0%
1983 172,320 constant LCU per square kilometre -1.7%
1984 175,003 constant LCU per square kilometre +1.6%
1985 175,650 constant LCU per square kilometre +0.4%
1986 174,194 constant LCU per square kilometre -0.8%
1987 180,995 constant LCU per square kilometre +3.9%
1988 189,138 constant LCU per square kilometre +4.5%
1989 194,944 constant LCU per square kilometre +3.1%
1990 202,925 constant LCU per square kilometre +4.1%
1991 209,217 constant LCU per square kilometre +3.1%
1992 215,463 constant LCU per square kilometre +3.0%
1993 220,205 constant LCU per square kilometre +2.2%
1994 225,595 constant LCU per square kilometre +2.4%
1995 233,507 constant LCU per square kilometre +3.5%
1996 239,476 constant LCU per square kilometre +2.6%
1997 246,508 constant LCU per square kilometre +2.9%
1998 255,691 constant LCU per square kilometre +3.7%
1999 261,082 constant LCU per square kilometre +2.1%
2000 267,860 constant LCU per square kilometre +2.6%
2001 270,959 constant LCU per square kilometre +1.2%
2002 285,469 constant LCU per square kilometre +5.4%
2003 292,635 constant LCU per square kilometre +2.5%
2004 304,782 constant LCU per square kilometre +4.2%
2005 311,265 constant LCU per square kilometre +2.1%
2006 315,161 constant LCU per square kilometre +1.3%
2007 333,690 constant LCU per square kilometre +5.9%
2008 336,644 constant LCU per square kilometre +0.9%
2009 349,450 constant LCU per square kilometre +3.8%
2010 348,577 constant LCU per square kilometre -0.2%
2011 366,092 constant LCU per square kilometre +5.0%
2012 384,174 constant LCU per square kilometre +4.9%
2013 402,404 constant LCU per square kilometre +4.7%
2014 408,863 constant LCU per square kilometre +1.6%
2015 419,600 constant LCU per square kilometre +2.6%
2016 429,622 constant LCU per square kilometre +2.4%
2017 443,832 constant LCU per square kilometre +3.3%
2018 454,965 constant LCU per square kilometre +2.5%
2019 462,694 constant LCU per square kilometre +1.7%
2020 462,278 constant LCU per square kilometre -0.1%
2021 481,935 constant LCU per square kilometre +4.3%
2022 494,183 constant LCU per square kilometre +2.5%
2023 501,036 constant LCU per square kilometre +1.4%

Guatemala compared with similar countries

  • Guatemala's 501,036 constant LCU per square kilometre is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 302,333 constant LCU per square kilometre, 1.7× the median. (57 countries reporting)
  • Guatemala's 501,036 constant LCU per square kilometre is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 174,468 constant LCU per square kilometre, 2.9× the median. (36 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 91,173 constant LCU per square kilometre 74,859 constant LCU per square kilometre 107,084 constant LCU per square kilometre 9
1970s 148,118 constant LCU per square kilometre 113,284 constant LCU per square kilometre 175,836 constant LCU per square kilometre 10
1980s 179,692 constant LCU per square kilometre 172,320 constant LCU per square kilometre 194,944 constant LCU per square kilometre 10
1990s 230,967 constant LCU per square kilometre 202,925 constant LCU per square kilometre 261,082 constant LCU per square kilometre 10
2000s 306,792 constant LCU per square kilometre 267,860 constant LCU per square kilometre 349,450 constant LCU per square kilometre 10
2010s 412,082 constant LCU per square kilometre 348,577 constant LCU per square kilometre 462,694 constant LCU per square kilometre 10
2020s 484,858 constant LCU per square kilometre 462,278 constant LCU per square kilometre 501,036 constant LCU per square kilometre 4

Countries ranked near Guatemala

  1. 75 Afghanistan 584,696 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
  2. 76 Barbados 555,154 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
  3. 77 Denmark 538,968 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
  4. 79 Syria 485,945 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
  5. 80 Algeria 485,120 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
  6. 81 Ukraine 439,480 constant LCU per square kilometre compare

See the full ranking of 195 places →

More economy & growth data for Guatemala

All data for Guatemala →

Frequently asked questions

What is agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per in Guatemala?
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per in Guatemala was 501,036 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per recorded in Guatemala?
The highest recorded value was 501,036 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023.
What is the lowest agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per recorded in Guatemala?
The lowest recorded value was 74,859 constant LCU per square kilometre in 1961.
How does Guatemala rank for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per?
Guatemala ranks 78th out of 194 countries with data for 2023.
Is agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per rising or falling in Guatemala?
Over the last ten years it is up 24.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Guatemala data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per in Guatemala. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/stat/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/stat/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/">Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per in Guatemala</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) ÷ Land area (sq. km)

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 7,966 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.