Afghanistan vs Guatemala: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per

Afghanistan
584,696 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala
501,036 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Afghanistan rank
75th
Guatemala rank
78th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per over time

  • Afghanistan
  • Guatemala
0200.0k400.0k600.0k196119922023

How they compare

Afghanistan currently reports 584,696 constant LCU per square kilometre against 501,036 constant LCU per square kilometre in Guatemala, a difference of 83,660 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Afghanistan's figure about 1.2 times Guatemala's.

Across all 22 years both countries report, Afghanistan has been ahead every year.

Afghanistan ranks 75th and Guatemala ranks 78th of 194 countries.

Afghanistan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan Guatemala Difference Ahead
2000s 407,008 constant LCU per square kilometre 316,137 constant LCU per square kilometre 90,871 constant LCU per square kilometre Afghanistan
2010s 535,300 constant LCU per square kilometre 412,082 constant LCU per square kilometre 123,218 constant LCU per square kilometre Afghanistan
2020s 611,833 constant LCU per square kilometre 484,858 constant LCU per square kilometre 126,975 constant LCU per square kilometre Afghanistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per, Afghanistan or Guatemala?
Afghanistan, at 584,696 constant LCU per square kilometre against 501,036 constant LCU per square kilometre in Guatemala as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per between Afghanistan and Guatemala?
83,660 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Afghanistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Guatemala?
22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
How do Afghanistan and Guatemala rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per?
Afghanistan ranks 75th and Guatemala ranks 78th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Afghanistan vs Guatemala: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/afghanistan/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/afghanistan/guatemala/">Afghanistan vs Guatemala: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 7,966 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.