Barbados vs Guatemala: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per

Barbados
555,154 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala
501,036 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados rank
76th
Guatemala rank
78th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per over time

  • Barbados
  • Guatemala
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k1.0M196119922023

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 555,154 constant LCU per square kilometre against 501,036 constant LCU per square kilometre in Guatemala, a difference of 54,118 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Barbados's figure about 1.1 times Guatemala's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Barbados ahead.

Barbados ranks 76th and Guatemala ranks 78th of 194 countries.

Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Guatemala Difference Ahead
1970s 874,962 constant LCU per square kilometre 164,949 constant LCU per square kilometre 710,013 constant LCU per square kilometre Barbados
1980s 865,768 constant LCU per square kilometre 179,692 constant LCU per square kilometre 686,076 constant LCU per square kilometre Barbados
1990s 704,750 constant LCU per square kilometre 230,967 constant LCU per square kilometre 473,784 constant LCU per square kilometre Barbados
2000s 616,252 constant LCU per square kilometre 306,792 constant LCU per square kilometre 309,461 constant LCU per square kilometre Barbados
2010s 604,000 constant LCU per square kilometre 412,082 constant LCU per square kilometre 191,918 constant LCU per square kilometre Barbados
2020s 622,911 constant LCU per square kilometre 484,858 constant LCU per square kilometre 138,053 constant LCU per square kilometre Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per, Barbados or Guatemala?
Barbados, at 555,154 constant LCU per square kilometre against 501,036 constant LCU per square kilometre in Guatemala as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per between Barbados and Guatemala?
54,118 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Guatemala?
49 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Guatemala rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per?
Barbados ranks 76th and Guatemala ranks 78th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Guatemala: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/barbados/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/barbados/guatemala/">Barbados vs Guatemala: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 7,966 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.