Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square in Chile
Chile: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square was 37,811 current US$ per square kilometre in 2021. ◆ Volatile
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square in Chile, 1970–2021
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2021, adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square in Chile stood at 37,811 current US$ per square kilometre. That is the highest value across all 52 years on record.
The figure is up 344.2% on the previous year and up 88.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square in Chile peaked at 37,811 current US$ per square kilometre in 2021 and was at its lowest, 470.34 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1972.
That places Chile 2nd out of 216 countries with data for 2021, putting it in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square in Chile, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 665.58 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1971 | 492.7 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.0% |
| 1972 | 470.34 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.5% |
| 1973 | 886.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +88.5% |
| 1974 | 1,241 current US$ per square kilometre | +40.0% |
| 1975 | 576.04 current US$ per square kilometre | -53.6% |
| 1976 | 829.43 current US$ per square kilometre | +44.0% |
| 1977 | 759.98 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.4% |
| 1978 | 729.7 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.0% |
| 1979 | 1,237 current US$ per square kilometre | +69.6% |
| 1980 | 1,454 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.5% |
| 1981 | 1,025 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.5% |
| 1982 | 922.15 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.0% |
| 1983 | 1,072 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.3% |
| 1984 | 878.8 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.0% |
| 1985 | 960.97 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.4% |
| 1986 | 850.75 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.5% |
| 1987 | 1,262 current US$ per square kilometre | +48.4% |
| 1988 | 2,192 current US$ per square kilometre | +73.7% |
| 1989 | 2,743 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.1% |
| 1990 | 2,434 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.3% |
| 1991 | 1,336 current US$ per square kilometre | -45.1% |
| 1992 | 1,240 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.2% |
| 1993 | 814.66 current US$ per square kilometre | -34.3% |
| 1994 | 1,554 current US$ per square kilometre | +90.7% |
| 1995 | 3,007 current US$ per square kilometre | +93.5% |
| 1996 | 2,686 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.7% |
| 1997 | 2,893 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.7% |
| 1998 | 1,334 current US$ per square kilometre | -53.9% |
| 1999 | 2,033 current US$ per square kilometre | +52.4% |
| 2000 | 3,144 current US$ per square kilometre | +54.6% |
| 2001 | 1,716 current US$ per square kilometre | -45.4% |
| 2002 | 1,472 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.2% |
| 2003 | 2,662 current US$ per square kilometre | +80.8% |
| 2004 | 7,605 current US$ per square kilometre | +185.7% |
| 2005 | 9,226 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.3% |
| 2006 | 21,346 current US$ per square kilometre | +131.4% |
| 2007 | 23,205 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.7% |
| 2008 | 18,430 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.6% |
| 2009 | 11,334 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.5% |
| 2010 | 17,581 current US$ per square kilometre | +55.1% |
| 2011 | 20,026 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.9% |
| 2012 | 15,878 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.7% |
| 2013 | 13,530 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.8% |
| 2014 | 11,328 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.3% |
| 2015 | 5,676 current US$ per square kilometre | -49.9% |
| 2016 | 4,651 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.1% |
| 2017 | 9,413 current US$ per square kilometre | +102.4% |
| 2018 | 11,946 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.9% |
| 2019 | 3,635 current US$ per square kilometre | -69.6% |
| 2020 | 8,511 current US$ per square kilometre | +134.2% |
| 2021 | 37,811 current US$ per square kilometre | +344.2% |
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square in Chile changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | +344.2% | 8,511 current US$ per square kilometre | 37,811 current US$ per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 788.9 current US$ per square kilometre | 470.34 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,241 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 1,336 current US$ per square kilometre | 850.75 current US$ per square kilometre | 2,743 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 1,933 current US$ per square kilometre | 814.66 current US$ per square kilometre | 3,007 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 10,014 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,472 current US$ per square kilometre | 23,205 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 11,366 current US$ per square kilometre | 3,635 current US$ per square kilometre | 20,026 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 23,161 current US$ per square kilometre | 8,511 current US$ per square kilometre | 37,811 current US$ per square kilometre | 2 |
Countries ranked near Chile
- 1 New Caledonia 48,878 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 3 Dominican Republic 26,291 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 4 Armenia 15,891 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 5 Philippines 15,450 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More economy & growth data for Chile
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 2.04 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 2.32 Percent per annum (2029)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), gaps 8.68 billion BoP, current US$ (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.0243 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 437.31 BoP, current US$ per person (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled 14.51 billion BoP, current US$ (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), annual 10.75 % change on previous year (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.0406 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 730.79 BoP, current US$ per person (2025)
- Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), annual growth rate 11.37 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square in Chile?
- Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square in Chile was 37,811 current US$ per square kilometre in 2021, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square recorded in Chile?
- The highest recorded value was 37,811 current US$ per square kilometre in 2021.
- What is the lowest adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square recorded in Chile?
- The lowest recorded value was 470.34 current US$ per square kilometre in 1972.
- How does Chile rank for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
- Chile ranks 2nd out of 216 countries with data for 2021.
- Is adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square rising or falling in Chile?
- Over the last ten years it is up 88.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Chile data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 52 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Adjusted savings: mineral depletion Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.