Armenia vs Chile: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

Armenia
15,891 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Chile
37,811 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Armenia rank
4th
Chile rank
2nd

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

  • Armenia
  • Chile
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k197019952021

How they compare

Chile currently reports 37,811 current US$ per square kilometre against 15,891 current US$ per square kilometre in Armenia, a difference of 21,920 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Chile's figure about 2.4 times Armenia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Chile ahead.

Armenia ranks 4th and Chile ranks 2nd of 216 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Armenia Chile Difference Ahead
1990s 81.9 current US$ per square kilometre 1,945 current US$ per square kilometre 1,863 current US$ per square kilometre Chile
2000s 68.73 current US$ per square kilometre 10,014 current US$ per square kilometre 9,945 current US$ per square kilometre Chile
2010s 2,189 current US$ per square kilometre 11,366 current US$ per square kilometre 9,178 current US$ per square kilometre Chile
2020s 9,803 current US$ per square kilometre 23,161 current US$ per square kilometre 13,358 current US$ per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Armenia or Chile?
Chile, at 37,811 current US$ per square kilometre against 15,891 current US$ per square kilometre in Armenia as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Armenia and Chile?
21,920 current US$ per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Chile?
30 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2021.
How do Armenia and Chile rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
Armenia ranks 4th and Chile ranks 2nd of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Armenia vs Chile: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/armenia/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/armenia/chile/">Armenia vs Chile: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.