Chile vs Philippines: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

Chile
37,811 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Philippines
15,450 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Chile rank
2nd
Philippines rank
5th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

  • Chile
  • Philippines
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k197019952021

How they compare

Chile currently reports 37,811 current US$ per square kilometre against 15,450 current US$ per square kilometre in Philippines, a difference of 22,361 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Chile's figure about 2.4 times Philippines's.

Across all 52 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.

Chile ranks 2nd and Philippines ranks 5th of 216 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Philippines Difference Ahead
1970s 788.9 current US$ per square kilometre 404.64 current US$ per square kilometre 384.26 current US$ per square kilometre Chile
1980s 1,336 current US$ per square kilometre 645.4 current US$ per square kilometre 690.77 current US$ per square kilometre Chile
1990s 1,933 current US$ per square kilometre 258.41 current US$ per square kilometre 1,675 current US$ per square kilometre Chile
2000s 10,014 current US$ per square kilometre 1,749 current US$ per square kilometre 8,265 current US$ per square kilometre Chile
2010s 11,366 current US$ per square kilometre 4,650 current US$ per square kilometre 6,716 current US$ per square kilometre Chile
2020s 23,161 current US$ per square kilometre 9,561 current US$ per square kilometre 13,600 current US$ per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Chile or Philippines?
Chile, at 37,811 current US$ per square kilometre against 15,450 current US$ per square kilometre in Philippines as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Chile and Philippines?
22,361 current US$ per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Philippines?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Chile and Philippines rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
Chile ranks 2nd and Philippines ranks 5th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Philippines: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/philippines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/philippines/">Chile vs Philippines: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.