Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square in Bermuda
Bermuda: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square was 685,109 current US$ per square kilometre in 2021. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2021)
685,109 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 18.9%
World rank
6th
of 208 countries
All-time high
723,091 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2016
All-time low
20,907 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1970
Years of data
52
1970–2021
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square in Bermuda, 1970–2021
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square in Bermuda is 685,109 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2021.
The figure is up 18.9% on the previous year and up 60.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square in Bermuda peaked at 723,091 current US$ per square kilometre in 2016 and was at its lowest, 20,907 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1970.
Bermuda ranks 6th of 208 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square in Bermuda, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 20,907 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1971 | 22,463 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.4% |
| 1972 | 28,328 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.1% |
| 1973 | 31,610 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.6% |
| 1974 | 31,302 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.0% |
| 1975 | 42,011 current US$ per square kilometre | +34.2% |
| 1976 | 41,334 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.6% |
| 1977 | 49,508 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.8% |
| 1978 | 55,036 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.2% |
| 1979 | 57,456 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 1980 | 65,113 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.3% |
| 1981 | 62,951 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.3% |
| 1982 | 66,909 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.3% |
| 1983 | 79,494 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.8% |
| 1984 | 96,709 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.7% |
| 1985 | 97,814 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 1986 | 94,467 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.4% |
| 1987 | 147,408 current US$ per square kilometre | +56.0% |
| 1988 | 171,679 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.5% |
| 1989 | 200,817 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.0% |
| 1990 | 148,119 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.2% |
| 1991 | 148,400 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.2% |
| 1992 | 128,600 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.3% |
| 1993 | 143,760 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.8% |
| 1994 | 143,494 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.2% |
| 1995 | 147,241 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 1996 | 158,761 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.8% |
| 1997 | 156,253 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.6% |
| 1998 | 163,196 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 1999 | 178,816 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.6% |
| 2000 | 187,052 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.6% |
| 2001 | 196,643 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.1% |
| 2002 | 217,676 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.7% |
| 2003 | 285,537 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.2% |
| 2004 | 305,926 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.1% |
| 2005 | 325,615 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.4% |
| 2006 | 372,326 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.3% |
| 2007 | 432,141 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.1% |
| 2008 | 430,430 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.4% |
| 2009 | 403,207 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.3% |
| 2010 | 491,524 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.9% |
| 2011 | 426,187 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.3% |
| 2012 | 506,783 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.9% |
| 2013 | 512,757 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 2014 | 670,707 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.8% |
| 2015 | 578,413 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.8% |
| 2016 | 723,091 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.0% |
| 2017 | 557,713 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.9% |
| 2018 | 655,461 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.5% |
| 2019 | 673,685 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 2020 | 576,041 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.5% |
| 2021 | 685,109 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.9% |
Bermuda compared with similar countries
- Bermuda's 685,109 current US$ per square kilometre is above the median for high income countries, which is 31,772 current US$ per square kilometre, 21.6× the median. (78 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 37,995 current US$ per square kilometre | 20,907 current US$ per square kilometre | 57,456 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 108,336 current US$ per square kilometre | 62,951 current US$ per square kilometre | 200,817 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 151,664 current US$ per square kilometre | 128,600 current US$ per square kilometre | 178,816 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 315,655 current US$ per square kilometre | 187,052 current US$ per square kilometre | 432,141 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 579,632 current US$ per square kilometre | 426,187 current US$ per square kilometre | 723,091 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 630,575 current US$ per square kilometre | 576,041 current US$ per square kilometre | 685,109 current US$ per square kilometre | 2 |
Countries ranked near Bermuda
- 3 Singapore 2.92 million current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 4 Bahrain 1.81 million current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 5 Hong Kong 1.43 million current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 7 Qatar 355,917 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 8 Maldives 322,448 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 9 Aruba 319,464 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More economy & growth data for Bermuda
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.0128 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), gaps 33.80 million BoP, current US$ (2024)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.0037 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 522.99 BoP, current US$ per person (2024)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled 117.84 million BoP, current US$ (2024)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), annual -21.86 % change on previous year (2024)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 1,823 BoP, current US$ per person (2024)
- General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU) 4.44 % change on previous year (2024)
- General government final consumption expenditure (current US$), per 15,245 current US$ per person (2024)
- General government final consumption expenditure (current US$), per 0.1072 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square in Bermuda?
- Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square in Bermuda was 685,109 current US$ per square kilometre in 2021, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square recorded in Bermuda?
- The highest recorded value was 723,091 current US$ per square kilometre in 2016.
- What is the lowest adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square recorded in Bermuda?
- The lowest recorded value was 20,907 current US$ per square kilometre in 1970.
- How does Bermuda rank for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?
- Bermuda ranks 6th out of 208 countries with data for 2021.
- Is adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square rising or falling in Bermuda?
- Over the last ten years it is up 60.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Bermuda data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 52 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.