Bermuda vs Maldives: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Bermuda
685,109 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Maldives
322,448 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Bermuda rank
6th
Maldives rank
8th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

  • Bermuda
  • Maldives
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k197019952021

How they compare

Bermuda currently reports 685,109 current US$ per square kilometre against 322,448 current US$ per square kilometre in Maldives, a difference of 362,661 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Bermuda's figure about 2.1 times Maldives's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Bermuda has been ahead every year.

Bermuda ranks 6th and Maldives ranks 8th of 208 countries.

Bermuda has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bermuda Maldives Difference Ahead
1990s 151,664 current US$ per square kilometre 13,268 current US$ per square kilometre 138,396 current US$ per square kilometre Bermuda
2000s 315,655 current US$ per square kilometre 55,668 current US$ per square kilometre 259,987 current US$ per square kilometre Bermuda
2010s 579,632 current US$ per square kilometre 174,799 current US$ per square kilometre 404,833 current US$ per square kilometre Bermuda
2020s 630,575 current US$ per square kilometre 263,778 current US$ per square kilometre 366,798 current US$ per square kilometre Bermuda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Bermuda or Maldives?
Bermuda, at 685,109 current US$ per square kilometre against 322,448 current US$ per square kilometre in Maldives as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Bermuda and Maldives?
362,661 current US$ per square kilometre, with Bermuda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bermuda and Maldives?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Bermuda and Maldives rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?
Bermuda ranks 6th and Maldives ranks 8th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bermuda vs Maldives: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bermuda/maldives/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bermuda/maldives/">Bermuda vs Maldives: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.