Bermuda vs Singapore: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Bermuda
685,109 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Singapore
2.92 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Bermuda rank
6th
Singapore rank
3rd

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

  • Bermuda
  • Singapore
01.0M2.0M3.0M197019952021

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 2.92 million current US$ per square kilometre against 685,109 current US$ per square kilometre in Bermuda, a difference of 2.23 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Singapore's figure about 4.3 times Bermuda's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.

Bermuda ranks 6th and Singapore ranks 3rd of 208 countries.

Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bermuda Singapore Difference Ahead
1990s 151,664 current US$ per square kilometre 798,503 current US$ per square kilometre 646,839 current US$ per square kilometre Singapore
2000s 315,655 current US$ per square kilometre 1.30 million current US$ per square kilometre 987,971 current US$ per square kilometre Singapore
2010s 579,632 current US$ per square kilometre 2.21 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.63 million current US$ per square kilometre Singapore
2020s 630,575 current US$ per square kilometre 2.76 million current US$ per square kilometre 2.13 million current US$ per square kilometre Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Bermuda or Singapore?
Singapore, at 2.92 million current US$ per square kilometre against 685,109 current US$ per square kilometre in Bermuda as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Bermuda and Singapore?
2.23 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bermuda and Singapore?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Bermuda and Singapore rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?
Bermuda ranks 6th and Singapore ranks 3rd of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bermuda vs Singapore: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bermuda/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bermuda/singapore/">Bermuda vs Singapore: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.