2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Uzbekistan
Uzbekistan: 2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk was 0 % in 2025. ▼ Falling
2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Uzbekistan, 2003–2025
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.
Analysis
The most recent figure for 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Uzbekistan is 0 %, measured in 2025. That is the lowest value across all 12 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 100.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Uzbekistan peaked at 13 % in 2003 and was at its lowest, 0 %, in 2024.
Uzbekistan ranks 59th of 120 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 12 years of available data.
2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Uzbekistan, year by year
| Year | % | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 13 % | — |
| 2004 | 13 % | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 13 % | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 13 % | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 13 % | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 13 % | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 13 % | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 13 % | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 13 % | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 13 % | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 0 % | -100.0% |
| 2025 | 0 % | — |
Uzbekistan compared with similar countries
- Uzbekistan's 0 % is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 17 %. (39 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 13 % | 13 % | 13 % | 7 |
| 2010s | 13 % | 13 % | 13 % | 3 |
| 2020s | 0 % | 0 % | 0 % | 2 |
Countries ranked near Uzbekistan
- 57 China, mainland 3 % compare
- 57 Mexico 3 % compare
- 59 Albania 0 % compare
- 59 Algeria 0 % compare
- 59 Azerbaijan 0 %
- 59 Bangladesh 0 % compare
- 59 Benin 0 %
- 59 Botswana 0 % compare
- 59 Burkina Faso 0 %
- 59 Burundi 0 %
- 59 Cameroon 0 %
- 59 Chad 0 % compare
- 59 Chile 0 % compare
- 59 Costa Rica 0 % compare
- 59 Cuba 0 % compare
- 59 Cyprus 0 %
- 59 Dominican Republic 0 %
- 59 Ecuador 0 % compare
- 59 Egypt 0 % compare
- 59 Estonia 0 % compare
- 59 Eswatini 0 % compare
- 59 Gambia 0 %
- 59 Ghana 0 % compare
- 59 Greece 0 %
- 59 Guinea 0 %
- 59 Iceland 0 %
- 59 Iraq 0 %
- 59 Japan 0 % compare
- 59 Jordan 0 %
- 59 Kenya 0 %
- 59 Kiribati 0 %
- 59 Latvia 0 %
- 59 Lebanon 0 %
- 59 Madagascar 0 %
- 59 Mali 0 %
- 59 Malta 0 %
- 59 Mauritania 0 %
- 59 Mauritius 0 %
- 59 Mongolia 0 %
- 59 Montenegro 0 %
- 59 Mozambique 0 %
- 59 Niger 0 %
- 59 Nigeria 0 %
- 59 Oman 0 %
- 59 Pakistan 0 %
- 59 Palestine, State of 0 %
- 59 Peru 0 % compare
- 59 Philippines 0 % compare
- 59 Portugal 0 %
- 59 Qatar 0 %
- 59 Romania 0 % compare
- 59 Saint Lucia 0 %
- 59 Samoa 0 %
- 59 Seychelles 0 %
- 59 Sudan 0 %
- 59 Suriname 0 %
- 59 Tajikistan 0 %
- 59 Thailand 0 %
- 59 Togo 0 % compare
- 59 Tunisia 0 %
- 59 Uganda 0 %
- 59 Yemen 0 %
- 59 Zambia 0 %
More economy & growth data for Uzbekistan
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 4.35 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 5.5 Percent per annum (2029)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), gaps 158.18 million BoP, current US$ (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.0011 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 4.27 BoP, current US$ per person (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled 4.40 billion BoP, current US$ (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), annual 47.86 % change on previous year (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.0299 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 118.7 BoP, current US$ per person (2025)
- Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), annual growth rate 19.33 % change on previous year (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Uzbekistan?
- 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Uzbekistan was 0 % in 2025, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk recorded in Uzbekistan?
- The highest recorded value was 13 % in 2003.
- What is the lowest 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk recorded in Uzbekistan?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 % in 2024.
- How does Uzbekistan rank for 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk?
- Uzbekistan ranks 59th out of 120 countries with data for 2025.
- Is 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk rising or falling in Uzbekistan?
- Over the last ten years it is down 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Uzbekistan data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of 2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of extinction — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.