2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Chad
Chad: 2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk was 0 % in 2009. ◆ Volatile
2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Chad, 2000–2009
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.
Analysis
In 2009, 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Chad stood at 0 %. That is the lowest value across all 10 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 100.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Chad peaked at 17 % in 2000 and was at its lowest, 0 %, in 2002.
Chad ranks 59th of 120 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Chad, year by year
| Year | % | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 17 % | — |
| 2001 | 17 % | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 0 % | -100.0% |
| 2003 | 0 % | — |
| 2004 | 0 % | — |
| 2005 | 0 % | — |
| 2006 | 0 % | — |
| 2007 | 0 % | — |
| 2008 | 0 % | — |
| 2009 | 0 % | — |
Countries ranked near Chad
- 57 China, mainland 3 % compare
- 57 Mexico 3 % compare
- 59 Albania 0 % compare
- 59 Algeria 0 % compare
- 59 Azerbaijan 0 %
- 59 Bangladesh 0 % compare
- 59 Benin 0 %
- 59 Botswana 0 % compare
- 59 Burkina Faso 0 %
- 59 Burundi 0 %
- 59 Cameroon 0 %
- 59 Chile 0 % compare
- 59 Costa Rica 0 % compare
- 59 Cuba 0 % compare
- 59 Cyprus 0 %
- 59 Dominican Republic 0 %
- 59 Ecuador 0 % compare
- 59 Egypt 0 % compare
- 59 Estonia 0 % compare
- 59 Eswatini 0 % compare
- 59 Gambia 0 %
- 59 Ghana 0 % compare
- 59 Greece 0 %
- 59 Guinea 0 %
- 59 Iceland 0 %
- 59 Iraq 0 %
- 59 Japan 0 % compare
- 59 Jordan 0 %
- 59 Kenya 0 %
- 59 Kiribati 0 %
- 59 Latvia 0 %
- 59 Lebanon 0 %
- 59 Madagascar 0 %
- 59 Mali 0 %
- 59 Malta 0 %
- 59 Mauritania 0 %
- 59 Mauritius 0 %
- 59 Mongolia 0 %
- 59 Montenegro 0 %
- 59 Mozambique 0 %
- 59 Niger 0 %
- 59 Nigeria 0 %
- 59 Oman 0 %
- 59 Pakistan 0 %
- 59 Palestine, State of 0 %
- 59 Peru 0 % compare
- 59 Philippines 0 % compare
- 59 Portugal 0 %
- 59 Qatar 0 %
- 59 Romania 0 % compare
- 59 Saint Lucia 0 %
- 59 Samoa 0 %
- 59 Seychelles 0 %
- 59 Sudan 0 %
- 59 Suriname 0 %
- 59 Tajikistan 0 %
- 59 Thailand 0 %
- 59 Togo 0 % compare
- 59 Tunisia 0 %
- 59 Uganda 0 %
- 59 Uzbekistan 0 % compare
- 59 Yemen 0 %
- 59 Zambia 0 %
More economy & growth data for Chad
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP -0.2407 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 2.66 Percent per annum (2029)
- Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU) -1.16 % change on previous year (2025)
- Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU) 331.98 current LCU per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU) 339,399 current LCU per person (2025)
- Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015) 6.31 % change on previous year (2025)
- Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015) 0.5571 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015) 569.56 constant 2015 US$ per person (2025)
- Final consumption expenditure (current US$), annual growth rate 3.75 % change on previous year (2025)
- Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per unit of GDP 0.6695 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Chad?
- 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in Chad was 0 % in 2009, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk recorded in Chad?
- The highest recorded value was 17 % in 2000.
- What is the lowest 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk recorded in Chad?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 % in 2002.
- How does Chad rank for 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk?
- Chad ranks 59th out of 120 countries with data for 2009.
- Is 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk rising or falling in Chad?
- Over the last ten years it is down 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Chad data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of 2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of extinction — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.