2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in China, mainland
China, mainland: 2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk was 3 % in 2025. ◆ Volatile
2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in China, mainland, 2005–2025
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.
Analysis
The most recent figure for 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in China, mainland is 3 %, measured in 2025.
That represents a change of down 89.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in China, mainland peaked at 33 % in 2006 and was at its lowest, 0 %, in 2005.
China, mainland ranks 57th of 120 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in China, mainland, year by year
| Year | % | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 0 % | — |
| 2006 | 33 % | — |
| 2007 | 33 % | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 25 % | -24.2% |
| 2009 | 25 % | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 25 % | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 25 % | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 25 % | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 25 % | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 25 % | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 29 % | +16.0% |
| 2016 | 20 % | -31.0% |
| 2017 | 0 % | -100.0% |
| 2021 | 3 % | — |
| 2022 | 3 % | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 3 % | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 3 % | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 3 % | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 23.2 % | 0 % | 33 % | 5 |
| 2010s | 21.75 % | 0 % | 29 % | 8 |
| 2020s | 3 % | 3 % | 3 % | 5 |
Countries ranked near China, mainland
- 57 Mexico 3 % compare
- 59 Albania 0 % compare
- 59 Algeria 0 % compare
- 59 Azerbaijan 0 %
- 59 Bangladesh 0 % compare
- 59 Benin 0 %
- 59 Botswana 0 % compare
- 59 Burkina Faso 0 %
- 59 Burundi 0 %
- 59 Cameroon 0 %
- 59 Chad 0 % compare
- 59 Chile 0 % compare
- 59 Costa Rica 0 % compare
- 59 Cuba 0 % compare
- 59 Cyprus 0 %
- 59 Dominican Republic 0 %
- 59 Ecuador 0 % compare
- 59 Egypt 0 % compare
- 59 Estonia 0 % compare
- 59 Eswatini 0 % compare
- 59 Gambia 0 %
- 59 Ghana 0 % compare
- 59 Greece 0 %
- 59 Guinea 0 %
- 59 Iceland 0 %
- 59 Iraq 0 %
- 59 Japan 0 % compare
- 59 Jordan 0 %
- 59 Kenya 0 %
- 59 Kiribati 0 %
- 59 Latvia 0 %
- 59 Lebanon 0 %
- 59 Madagascar 0 %
- 59 Mali 0 %
- 59 Malta 0 %
- 59 Mauritania 0 %
- 59 Mauritius 0 %
- 59 Mongolia 0 %
- 59 Montenegro 0 %
- 59 Mozambique 0 %
- 59 Niger 0 %
- 59 Nigeria 0 %
- 59 Oman 0 %
- 59 Pakistan 0 %
- 59 Palestine, State of 0 %
- 59 Peru 0 % compare
- 59 Philippines 0 % compare
- 59 Portugal 0 %
- 59 Qatar 0 %
- 59 Romania 0 % compare
- 59 Saint Lucia 0 %
- 59 Samoa 0 %
- 59 Seychelles 0 %
- 59 Sudan 0 %
- 59 Suriname 0 %
- 59 Tajikistan 0 %
- 59 Thailand 0 %
- 59 Togo 0 % compare
- 59 Tunisia 0 %
- 59 Uganda 0 %
- 59 Uzbekistan 0 % compare
- 59 Yemen 0 %
- 59 Zambia 0 %
More economy & growth data for China, mainland
- Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Share of GDP US$, 2015 prices 40.34 % (2024)
- Gross Domestic Product — Annual growth US$ per capita, 2015 prices 4.29 % (2024)
- Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency 56.10 million million SLC (2024)
- Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$ 7.79 million million USD (2024)
- Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 44.89 million million SLC (2024)
- Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, 2015 prices 7.21 million million USD (2024)
- Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Share of GDP US$ 40.83 % (2024)
- Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Annual growth US$ 5.95 % (2024)
- Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Annual growth Standard Local 4.06 % (2024)
- Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Annual growth Standard Local Currency 7.65 % (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in China, mainland?
- 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk in China, mainland was 3 % in 2025, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk recorded in China, mainland?
- The highest recorded value was 33 % in 2006.
- What is the lowest 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk recorded in China, mainland?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 % in 2005.
- How does China, mainland rank for 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk?
- China, mainland ranks 57th out of 120 countries with data for 2025.
- Is 2.5.2 proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk rising or falling in China, mainland?
- Over the last ten years it is down 89.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this China, mainland data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of 2.5.2 Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of extinction — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 18 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.