2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Palestine, State of

Palestine, State of: 2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of was 50 % in 2025. ▬ Flat

Latest (2025)
50 %
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
66th
of 130 countries
All-time high
50 %
in 2021
All-time low
50 %
in 2021
Years of data
5
2021–2025

2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Palestine, State of, 2021–2025

010203040502021202320252021: 50 %2022: 50 %2023: 50 %2024: 50 %2025: 50 %

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.

Analysis

The most recent figure for 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Palestine, State of is 50 %, measured in 2025. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over five years.

Palestine, State of ranks 66th of 130 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Palestine, State of, year by year

Annual values for 2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction — Value in Palestine, State of, 2021 to 2025.
Year % Change
2021 50 %
2022 50 % +0.0%
2023 50 % +0.0%
2024 50 % +0.0%
2025 50 % +0.0%

Palestine, State of compared with similar countries

  • Palestine, State of's 50 % is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 18.5 %, 2.7× the median. (30 countries reporting)
  • Palestine, State of's 50 % is above the median for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, which is 3 %, 16.7× the median. (14 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Palestine, State of

  1. 63 Sri Lanka 56 % compare
  2. 64 Hungary 55 % compare
  3. 65 Bhutan 52 % compare
  4. 66 Argentina 50 % compare
  5. 66 Faroe Islands 50 % compare
  6. 66 Iceland 50 % compare
  7. 66 Indonesia 50 % compare
  8. 66 Mexico 50 % compare
  9. 66 Myanmar 50 %
  10. 66 North Macedonia 50 %
  11. 66 Papua New Guinea 50 %

See the full ranking of 173 places →

More economy & growth data for Palestine, State of

All data for Palestine, State of →

Frequently asked questions

What is 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Palestine, State of?
2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Palestine, State of was 50 % in 2025, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of recorded in Palestine, State of?
The highest recorded value was 50 % in 2021.
What is the lowest 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of recorded in Palestine, State of?
The lowest recorded value was 50 % in 2021.
How does Palestine, State of rank for 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of?
Palestine, State of ranks 66th out of 130 countries with data for 2025.
Where does this Palestine, State of data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of 2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Palestine, State of. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/stat/2-5-2-proportion-of-local-breeds-classified-as-being-at-risk-of-extinction-value/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/stat/2-5-2-proportion-of-local-breeds-classified-as-being-at-risk-of-extinction-value/west-bank-and-gaza/">2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Palestine, State of</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
173 places, 3,245 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed

As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.