2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Faroe Islands
Faroe Islands: 2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of was 50 % in 2025. ◆ Volatile
2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Faroe Islands, 2000–2025
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.
Analysis
The most recent figure for 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Faroe Islands is 50 %, measured in 2025.
The figure is down 50.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Faroe Islands peaked at 100 % in 2016 and was at its lowest, 0 %, in 2000.
That places Faroe Islands 66th out of 130 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Faroe Islands, year by year
| Year | % | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 0 % | — |
| 2001 | 0 % | — |
| 2002 | 0 % | — |
| 2003 | 0 % | — |
| 2004 | 0 % | — |
| 2005 | 0 % | — |
| 2006 | 0 % | — |
| 2007 | 0 % | — |
| 2016 | 100 % | — |
| 2017 | 50 % | -50.0% |
| 2018 | 50 % | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 50 % | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 50 % | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 50 % | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 50 % | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 50 % | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 50 % | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 50 % | +0.0% |
Faroe Islands compared with similar countries
- Faroe Islands's 50 % is below the median for high income countries, which is 86 %, 58% of the median. (41 countries reporting)
- Faroe Islands's 50 % is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 81.5 %, 61% of the median. (44 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 % | 0 % | 0 % | 8 |
| 2010s | 62.5 % | 50 % | 100 % | 4 |
| 2020s | 50 % | 50 % | 50 % | 6 |
Countries ranked near Faroe Islands
More economy & growth data for Faroe Islands
- Exports of goods and services (current US$), annual growth rate -1.96 % change on previous year (2024)
- Exports of goods and services (current LCU), per capita 279,001 current LCU per person (2024)
- Exports of goods and services (current LCU), per unit of GDP 3.76 current LCU per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Exports of goods and services (current LCU), annual growth rate -1.89 % change on previous year (2024)
- Exports of goods and services (current US$), per capita 40,467 current US$ per person (2024)
- Exports of goods and services (current US$), per unit of GDP 0.5456 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per unit of GDP 6.66 current LCU per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Gross national expenditure (current US$), per capita 71,683 current US$ per person (2024)
- Gross national expenditure (current LCU), annual growth rate 0.4583 % change on previous year (2024)
- Gross capital formation (current US$), annual growth rate -7.73 % change on previous year (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Faroe Islands?
- 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Faroe Islands was 50 % in 2025, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of recorded in Faroe Islands?
- The highest recorded value was 100 % in 2016.
- What is the lowest 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of recorded in Faroe Islands?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 % in 2000.
- How does Faroe Islands rank for 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of?
- Faroe Islands ranks 66th out of 130 countries with data for 2025.
- Is 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of rising or falling in Faroe Islands?
- Over the last ten years it is down 50.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Faroe Islands data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of 2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 18 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.