2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Hungary

Hungary: 2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of was 55 % in 2025. ▼ Falling

Latest (2025)
55 %
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
64th
of 130 countries
All-time high
89 %
in 2016
All-time low
55 %
in 2022
Years of data
26
2000–2025

2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Hungary, 2000–2025

0204060802000201220252000: 70 %2001: 71 %2002: 65 %2003: 67 %2004: 74 %2005: 73 %2006: 74 %2007: 76 %2008: 79 %2009: 77 %2010: 80 %2011: 80 %2012: 85 %2013: 87 %2014: 88 %2015: 87 %2016: 89 %2017: 80 %2018: 80 %2019: 68 %2020: 57 %2021: 57 %2022: 55 %2023: 55 %2024: 55 %2025: 55 %

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.

Analysis

The most recent figure for 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Hungary is 55 %, measured in 2025. That is the lowest value across all 26 years on record.

The figure is down 36.8% over ten years.

Over the whole period, 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Hungary peaked at 89 % in 2016 and was at its lowest, 55 %, in 2022.

That places Hungary 64th out of 130 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 26 years of available data.

2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Hungary, year by year

Annual values for 2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction — Value in Hungary, 2000 to 2025.
Year % Change
2000 70 %
2001 71 % +1.4%
2002 65 % -8.5%
2003 67 % +3.1%
2004 74 % +10.4%
2005 73 % -1.4%
2006 74 % +1.4%
2007 76 % +2.7%
2008 79 % +3.9%
2009 77 % -2.5%
2010 80 % +3.9%
2011 80 % +0.0%
2012 85 % +6.2%
2013 87 % +2.4%
2014 88 % +1.1%
2015 87 % -1.1%
2016 89 % +2.3%
2017 80 % -10.1%
2018 80 % +0.0%
2019 68 % -15.0%
2020 57 % -16.2%
2021 57 % +0.0%
2022 55 % -3.5%
2023 55 % +0.0%
2024 55 % +0.0%
2025 55 % +0.0%

Hungary compared with similar countries

  • Hungary's 55 % is below the median for high income countries, which is 86 %, 64% of the median. (41 countries reporting)
  • Hungary's 55 % is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 81.5 %, 67% of the median. (44 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 72.6 % 65 % 79 % 10
2010s 82.4 % 68 % 89 % 10
2020s 55.67 % 55 % 57 % 6

Countries ranked near Hungary

  1. 61 Greece 62 % compare
  2. 62 Portugal 61 % compare
  3. 63 Sri Lanka 56 % compare
  4. 65 Bhutan 52 % compare
  5. 66 Argentina 50 % compare
  6. 66 Faroe Islands 50 % compare
  7. 66 Iceland 50 % compare
  8. 66 Indonesia 50 % compare
  9. 66 Mexico 50 % compare
  10. 66 Myanmar 50 % compare
  11. 66 North Macedonia 50 % compare
  12. 66 Palestine, State of 50 % compare
  13. 66 Papua New Guinea 50 % compare

See the full ranking of 173 places →

More economy & growth data for Hungary

All data for Hungary →

Frequently asked questions

What is 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Hungary?
2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Hungary was 55 % in 2025, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of recorded in Hungary?
The highest recorded value was 89 % in 2016.
What is the lowest 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of recorded in Hungary?
The lowest recorded value was 55 % in 2022.
How does Hungary rank for 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of?
Hungary ranks 64th out of 130 countries with data for 2025.
Is 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of rising or falling in Hungary?
Over the last ten years it is down 36.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Hungary data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of 2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Hungary. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/stat/2-5-2-proportion-of-local-breeds-classified-as-being-at-risk-of-extinction-value/hungary/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/stat/2-5-2-proportion-of-local-breeds-classified-as-being-at-risk-of-extinction-value/hungary/">2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Hungary</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
173 places, 3,245 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed

As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.