2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Poland

Poland: 2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of was 83 % in 2025. ▲ Rising

Latest (2025)
83 %
Change on year
down 2.4%
World rank
45th
of 130 countries
All-time high
94 %
in 2008
All-time low
68 %
in 2000
Years of data
26
2000–2025

2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Poland, 2000–2025

0204060801002000201220252000: 68 %2001: 69 %2002: 68 %2003: 68 %2004: 70 %2005: 68 %2006: 91 %2007: 90 %2008: 94 %2009: 93 %2010: 94 %2011: 93 %2012: 91 %2013: 84 %2014: 84 %2015: 84 %2016: 87 %2017: 87 %2018: 88 %2019: 87 %2020: 86 %2021: 86 %2022: 86 %2023: 85 %2024: 85 %2025: 83 %

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.

Analysis

The most recent figure for 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Poland is 83 %, measured in 2025.

The figure is down 2.4% on the previous year and down 1.2% over ten years.

Over the whole period, 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Poland peaked at 94 % in 2008 and was at its lowest, 68 %, in 2000.

Poland ranks 45th of 130 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 26 years of available data.

2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Poland, year by year

Annual values for 2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction — Value in Poland, 2000 to 2025.
Year % Change
2000 68 %
2001 69 % +1.5%
2002 68 % -1.4%
2003 68 % +0.0%
2004 70 % +2.9%
2005 68 % -2.9%
2006 91 % +33.8%
2007 90 % -1.1%
2008 94 % +4.4%
2009 93 % -1.1%
2010 94 % +1.1%
2011 93 % -1.1%
2012 91 % -2.2%
2013 84 % -7.7%
2014 84 % +0.0%
2015 84 % +0.0%
2016 87 % +3.6%
2017 87 % +0.0%
2018 88 % +1.1%
2019 87 % -1.1%
2020 86 % -1.1%
2021 86 % +0.0%
2022 86 % +0.0%
2023 85 % -1.2%
2024 85 % +0.0%
2025 83 % -2.4%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 77.9 % 68 % 94 % 10
2010s 87.9 % 84 % 94 % 10
2020s 85.17 % 83 % 86 % 6

Countries ranked near Poland

  1. 42 Austria 86 % compare
  2. 42 Panama 86 % compare
  3. 44 Slovakia 84 % compare
  4. 45 France 83 % compare
  5. 47 South Africa 81 % compare
  6. 48 Bangladesh 80 % compare
  7. 48 Croatia 80 % compare

See the full ranking of 173 places →

More economy & growth data for Poland

All data for Poland →

Frequently asked questions

What is 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Poland?
2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Poland was 83 % in 2025, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of recorded in Poland?
The highest recorded value was 94 % in 2008.
What is the lowest 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of recorded in Poland?
The lowest recorded value was 68 % in 2000.
How does Poland rank for 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of?
Poland ranks 45th out of 130 countries with data for 2025.
Is 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of rising or falling in Poland?
Over the last ten years it is down 1.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Poland data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of 2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Poland. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/stat/2-5-2-proportion-of-local-breeds-classified-as-being-at-risk-of-extinction-value/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/stat/2-5-2-proportion-of-local-breeds-classified-as-being-at-risk-of-extinction-value/poland/">2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Poland</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
173 places, 3,245 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed

As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.