2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Slovakia

Slovakia: 2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of was 84 % in 2025. ▬ Flat

Latest (2025)
84 %
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
44th
of 130 countries
All-time high
95 %
in 2007
All-time low
78 %
in 2003
Years of data
26
2000–2025

2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Slovakia, 2000–2025

0204060801002000201220252000: 83 %2001: 83 %2002: 83 %2003: 78 %2004: 86 %2005: 83 %2006: 83 %2007: 95 %2008: 95 %2009: 95 %2010: 95 %2011: 90 %2012: 95 %2013: 86 %2014: 86 %2015: 86 %2016: 91 %2017: 83 %2018: 84 %2019: 84 %2020: 84 %2021: 84 %2022: 84 %2023: 84 %2024: 84 %2025: 84 %

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.

Analysis

The most recent figure for 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Slovakia is 84 %, measured in 2025.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 2.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Slovakia peaked at 95 % in 2007 and was at its lowest, 78 %, in 2003.

Slovakia ranks 44th of 130 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Slovakia, year by year

Annual values for 2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction — Value in Slovakia, 2000 to 2025.
Year % Change
2000 83 %
2001 83 % +0.0%
2002 83 % +0.0%
2003 78 % -6.0%
2004 86 % +10.3%
2005 83 % -3.5%
2006 83 % +0.0%
2007 95 % +14.5%
2008 95 % +0.0%
2009 95 % +0.0%
2010 95 % +0.0%
2011 90 % -5.3%
2012 95 % +5.6%
2013 86 % -9.5%
2014 86 % +0.0%
2015 86 % +0.0%
2016 91 % +5.8%
2017 83 % -8.8%
2018 84 % +1.2%
2019 84 % +0.0%
2020 84 % +0.0%
2021 84 % +0.0%
2022 84 % +0.0%
2023 84 % +0.0%
2024 84 % +0.0%
2025 84 % +0.0%

Slovakia compared with similar countries

  • Slovakia's 84 % is below the median for high income countries, which is 86 %, 98% of the median. (41 countries reporting)
  • Slovakia's 84 % is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 81.5 %, 1.0× the median. (44 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 86.4 % 78 % 95 % 10
2010s 88 % 83 % 95 % 10
2020s 84 % 84 % 84 % 6

Countries ranked near Slovakia

  1. 42 Austria 86 % compare
  2. 42 Panama 86 % compare
  3. 45 France 83 % compare
  4. 45 Poland 83 % compare
  5. 47 South Africa 81 % compare

See the full ranking of 173 places →

More economy & growth data for Slovakia

All data for Slovakia →

Frequently asked questions

What is 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Slovakia?
2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Slovakia was 84 % in 2025, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of recorded in Slovakia?
The highest recorded value was 95 % in 2007.
What is the lowest 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of recorded in Slovakia?
The lowest recorded value was 78 % in 2003.
How does Slovakia rank for 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of?
Slovakia ranks 44th out of 130 countries with data for 2025.
Is 2.5.2 proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of rising or falling in Slovakia?
Over the last ten years it is down 2.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Slovakia data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of 2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Slovakia. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/stat/2-5-2-proportion-of-local-breeds-classified-as-being-at-risk-of-extinction-value/slovak-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/stat/2-5-2-proportion-of-local-breeds-classified-as-being-at-risk-of-extinction-value/slovak-republic/">2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of in Slovakia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
2.5.2 Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
173 places, 3,245 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed

As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.