Congo vs Rwanda: Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per capita

Congo
119.78 includes gold, current US$ per person
in 2024
Rwanda
134.71 includes gold, current US$ per person
in 2025
Congo rank
161st
Rwanda rank
159th

Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per capita over time

  • Congo
  • Rwanda
02505007501.0k1.2k196019922025

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 134.71 includes gold, current US$ per person against 119.78 includes gold, current US$ per person in Congo, a difference of 14.93 includes gold, current US$ per person.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1964 it was Rwanda ahead.

Congo ranks 161st and Rwanda ranks 159th of 182 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 5 and Rwanda in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 3.76 includes gold, current US$ per person 1.32 includes gold, current US$ per person 2.44 includes gold, current US$ per person Congo
1970s 9.88 includes gold, current US$ per person 9.76 includes gold, current US$ per person 0.1152 includes gold, current US$ per person Congo
1980s 17.26 includes gold, current US$ per person 21.83 includes gold, current US$ per person 4.57 includes gold, current US$ per person Rwanda
1990s 12.76 includes gold, current US$ per person 13.98 includes gold, current US$ per person 1.22 includes gold, current US$ per person Rwanda
2000s 321.27 includes gold, current US$ per person 46.89 includes gold, current US$ per person 274.38 includes gold, current US$ per person Congo
2010s 635.76 includes gold, current US$ per person 81.56 includes gold, current US$ per person 554.2 includes gold, current US$ per person Congo
2020s 142.56 includes gold, current US$ per person 139.61 includes gold, current US$ per person 2.95 includes gold, current US$ per person Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total reserves (includes gold, current us$), per capita, Congo or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 134.71 includes gold, current US$ per person against 119.78 includes gold, current US$ per person in Congo as of 2025.
What is the difference in total reserves (includes gold, current us$), per capita between Congo and Rwanda?
14.93 includes gold, current US$ per person, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Rwanda?
61 years are reported by both, from 1964 to 2024.
How do Congo and Rwanda rank globally for total reserves (includes gold, current us$), per capita?
Congo ranks 161st and Rwanda ranks 159th of 182 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Rwanda: Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-includes-gold-current-us-per-capita/congo-rep/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-includes-gold-current-us-per-capita/congo-rep/rwanda/">Congo vs Rwanda: Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per capita
Unit
includes gold, current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
183 places, 9,516 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Total reserves (includes gold, current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.