China, Macao Special Administrative Region vs Latvia: Merchandise trade as a proportion of GDP

China, Macao Special Administrative Region
35.8%
in 2024
Latvia
101.6%
in 2024
China, Macao Special Administrative Region rank
30th
Latvia rank
28th

Merchandise trade as a proportion of GDP over time

  • China, Macao Special Administrative Region
  • Latvia
255075100125150200020122024

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 101.6% against 35.8% in China, Macao Special Administrative Region, a difference of 65.8%.

That makes Latvia's figure about 2.8 times China, Macao Special Administrative Region's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was China, Macao Special Administrative Region ahead.

China, Macao Special Administrative Region ranks 30th and Latvia ranks 28th of 37 groups.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Macao Special Administrative Region Latvia Difference Ahead
2000s 57.9% 75.1% 17.1% Latvia
2010s 23.2% 105.5% 82.4% Latvia
2020s 54.7% 116.5% 61.8% Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher merchandise trade as a proportion of gdp, China, Macao Special Administrative Region or Latvia?
Latvia, at 101.6% against 35.8% in China, Macao Special Administrative Region as of 2024.
What is the difference in merchandise trade as a proportion of gdp between China, Macao Special Administrative Region and Latvia?
65.8%, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Macao Special Administrative Region and Latvia?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do China, Macao Special Administrative Region and Latvia rank globally for merchandise trade as a proportion of gdp?
China, Macao Special Administrative Region ranks 30th and Latvia ranks 28th of 37 groups.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Merchandise trade as a proportion of GDP (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Macao Special Administrative Region vs Latvia: Merchandise trade as a proportion of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/merchandise-trade-as-a-proportion-of-gdp-percent/china-macao-special-administrative-region/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/merchandise-trade-as-a-proportion-of-gdp-percent/china-macao-special-administrative-region/latvia/">China, Macao Special Administrative Region vs Latvia: Merchandise trade as a proportion of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Merchandise trade as a proportion of GDP (%)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
255 places, 6,196 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed